Hi everyone.

So for those who are aware, I'm working on bus drawings based on GNE liveries. Within these, I show the routes on all three blinds (front, rear and side). One problem I'm facing with a few is that the via points displayed on the front blind don't fit on the rear as the rear blinds are shorter.

Example is below – the drawing I'm focusing on is Loop 93.

Destination: Gateshead loop

Via points: VIA Low Fell then Heworth

Front display: 

Rear display: 

Obviously from the references here, the via points don't fit on the rear display. I was under the impression that the via points would be the same on both displays, but what would the solution be here? I had exactly the same problem yesterday trying to produce the display for service 35 to Low Moorsley, for which at one point the blind displays VIA Sunderland & Houghton and therefore also doesn't fit on the rear.

Any solutions? Anyone have any good quality photos of these? Probably asking for too much here...

Thanks

(04 Oct 2019, 7:14 pm)BeachBoy99 wrote

Hi everyone.

So for those who are aware, I'm working on bus drawings based on GNE liveries. Within these, I show the routes on all three blinds (front, rear and side). One problem I'm facing with a few is that the via points displayed on the front blind don't fit on the rear as the rear blinds are shorter.

Example is below – the drawing I'm focusing on is Loop 93.

Destination: Gateshead loop

Via points: VIA Low Fell then Heworth

Front display: 

Rear display: 

Obviously from the references here, the via points don't fit on the rear display. I was under the impression that the via points would be the same on both displays, but what would the solution be here? I had exactly the same problem yesterday trying to produce the display for service 35 to Low Moorsley, for which at one point the blind displays VIA Sunderland & Houghton and therefore also doesn't fit on the rear.

Any solutions? Anyone have any good quality photos of these? Probably asking for too much here...

Thanks

So I clicked the urls in your post and got the following images. Appreciate I'm not the most tech savvy when it comes to posting urls, but I'd go for a dowel joint and McLeans.

(04 Oct 2019, 9:15 pm)Andreos1 wrote

So I clicked the urls in your post and got the following images. Appreciate I'm not the most tech savvy when it comes to posting urls, but I'd go for a dowel joint and McLeans.

Wtf? :') They shouldn't be links either. They should be attached photos?

(04 Oct 2019, 10:24 pm)BeachBoy99 wrote

Wtf? :') They shouldn't be links either. They should be attached photos?

Dunno if this is what others are seeing.

(04 Oct 2019, 10:43 pm)Andreos1 wrote

Dunno if this is what others are seeing.

This is why I hate trying to attach photos into forums. Absolutely shit.

---

(04 Oct 2019, 10:43 pm)Andreos1 wrote

Dunno if this is what others are seeing.

It's probably because you're on mobile also. I'm using desktop.

I see the image,not a link

(04 Oct 2019, 11:17 pm)V514DFT wrote I see the image,not a link

same

So has anyone got any solutions to the problem rather than saying they can see the attached photos? -.-

I know the 35 just says “via Sunderland” on the rear rather than both via points.

(05 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm)deanmachine wrote

I know the 35 just says “via Sunderland” on the rear rather than both via points.

Ah right thanks! Thought it would have " alt="" title="">