Stagecoach North East: Service Suggestions
Stagecoach North East: Service Suggestions
If Stagecoach Newcastle were to start withdrawing services, which services would be withdrawn first? 87? 35? 32? 18? 8?
32/32A Benwell - Byker only, with plenty of services for Cowgate, Fenham and Blakelaw and Walker. Operated by GCT, or maybe A-line? Possibly Go North East?
(19 Dec 2021, 6:29 pm)OrangeArrow49 32/32A Benwell - Byker only, with plenty of services for Cowgate, Fenham and Blakelaw and Walker. Operated by GCT, or maybe A-line? Possibly Go North East?Gateshead Taxis!! Are you trying to put people off from getting the bus?
(19 Dec 2021, 6:29 pm)OrangeArrow49 32/32A Benwell - Byker only, with plenty of services for Cowgate, Fenham and Blakelaw and Walker. Operated by GCT, or maybe A-line? Possibly Go North East?Gateshead Taxis!! Are you trying to put people off from getting the bus?
(19 Dec 2021, 6:45 pm)Economic505 Gateshead Taxis!! Are you trying to put people off from getting the bus?
(19 Dec 2021, 6:45 pm)Economic505 Gateshead Taxis!! Are you trying to put people off from getting the bus?
(19 Dec 2021, 6:55 pm)OrangeArrow49 They have good buses and can run a service well. Although Go North East are my favourite, I do like A-line, GCT and Phoenix and would like them and Henry Cooper and Stanley Travel to operate more bus services. If GCT don't run too many services they can offer a reliable and cheap service.I don't think 'reliable' and 'GCT' often get used together in the same sentence
(19 Dec 2021, 6:55 pm)OrangeArrow49 They have good buses and can run a service well. Although Go North East are my favourite, I do like A-line, GCT and Phoenix and would like them and Henry Cooper and Stanley Travel to operate more bus services. If GCT don't run too many services they can offer a reliable and cheap service.I don't think 'reliable' and 'GCT' often get used together in the same sentence
(16 Dec 2021, 9:10 pm)OrangeArrow49 12 is confusing having Walker and Wallsend variations, and shorter ones to Scrogg Road. 12/13 makes sense and 13 could merge with the Nexus 13.
(16 Dec 2021, 9:10 pm)OrangeArrow49 74 - Stagecoach ran a 74 from Newcastle to Callerton at some point and I think Stagecoach having the 74 would be a good idea for a number of reasons. GNE should run the X77 as service 77.
(16 Dec 2021, 9:10 pm)OrangeArrow49 12 is confusing having Walker and Wallsend variations, and shorter ones to Scrogg Road. 12/13 makes sense and 13 could merge with the Nexus 13.
(16 Dec 2021, 9:10 pm)OrangeArrow49 74 - Stagecoach ran a 74 from Newcastle to Callerton at some point and I think Stagecoach having the 74 would be a good idea for a number of reasons. GNE should run the X77 as service 77.
(19 Dec 2021, 7:20 pm)peter I don't think 'reliable' and 'GCT' often get used together in the same sentence
(19 Dec 2021, 7:20 pm)peter I don't think 'reliable' and 'GCT' often get used together in the same sentence
(19 Dec 2021, 7:34 pm)OrangeArrow49 Believe me, I know how bad they are. They have let me down and I've seen how bad they are. All I'm saying is, they can run a good service when they want to. Regardless of that, Stagecoach has been incredibly shit for me and I think alternatives should continue to be available.On what grounds have Stagecoach been "relatively shit" for you.
Personally I'd like to see the 84/84A revised somehow, as it only seems useful Metrocentre to Benwell and I think it needs renumbering and some heavy marketing to support it's viability.
(19 Dec 2021, 7:34 pm)OrangeArrow49 Believe me, I know how bad they are. They have let me down and I've seen how bad they are. All I'm saying is, they can run a good service when they want to. Regardless of that, Stagecoach has been incredibly shit for me and I think alternatives should continue to be available.On what grounds have Stagecoach been "relatively shit" for you.
Personally I'd like to see the 84/84A revised somehow, as it only seems useful Metrocentre to Benwell and I think it needs renumbering and some heavy marketing to support it's viability.
(19 Dec 2021, 7:53 pm)ifm001 On what grounds have Stagecoach been "relatively shit" for you.
You keep saying that you never use Stagecoach services you deliberately use other operators mainly GNE 74 amd others so that you don't have to use Stagecoach.
In the past few months are you able to advise how many times you have used Stagecoach? Oh and can you advise just what the actual issue / problems you incur whilst using the Stagecoach services
(19 Dec 2021, 7:53 pm)ifm001 On what grounds have Stagecoach been "relatively shit" for you.
You keep saying that you never use Stagecoach services you deliberately use other operators mainly GNE 74 amd others so that you don't have to use Stagecoach.
In the past few months are you able to advise how many times you have used Stagecoach? Oh and can you advise just what the actual issue / problems you incur whilst using the Stagecoach services
(19 Dec 2021, 10:23 pm)Acky81 If you could shake up Sunderland’s network what would you do
(19 Dec 2021, 10:23 pm)Acky81 If you could shake up Sunderland’s network what would you do
(20 Dec 2021, 8:32 am)Andreos1 Extend the E's, beyond the city centre.
This would open up new links and make crossing the city (for places like the hospital) a lot more attractive and easier - removing the need to change buses
(20 Dec 2021, 8:32 am)Andreos1 Extend the E's, beyond the city centre.
This would open up new links and make crossing the city (for places like the hospital) a lot more attractive and easier - removing the need to change buses
(20 Dec 2021, 8:36 am)Dan Guidance from the Government in the new BSIP will see rationalisation (including removal of duplication on some corridors). If extending the Es beyond the City Centre, would you remove resource from something like the 16 in lieu despite this having a much more established customer base making use of the cross-city link already in place on this service?
(20 Dec 2021, 8:36 am)Dan Guidance from the Government in the new BSIP will see rationalisation (including removal of duplication on some corridors). If extending the Es beyond the City Centre, would you remove resource from something like the 16 in lieu despite this having a much more established customer base making use of the cross-city link already in place on this service?
(20 Dec 2021, 8:54 am)Andreos1 Why would the 16 need to be removed if the E1 was introduced?
There is a small portion of duplication (far less than say the GNE 2 and 78) and unless the E1 was extended to Hastings Hill, then I'm not sure there would be any cause for concern.
Start and end points are different
(20 Dec 2021, 8:54 am)Andreos1 Why would the 16 need to be removed if the E1 was introduced?
There is a small portion of duplication (far less than say the GNE 2 and 78) and unless the E1 was extended to Hastings Hill, then I'm not sure there would be any cause for concern.
Start and end points are different
(20 Dec 2021, 10:11 am)Dan From reading the BSIP, I think the argument here would be that you're adding resource into a service unnecessarily which would duplicate the offering of other services on this corridor.
The days of direct bus services here, there and everywhere are gone. Operators had already started to move away from this in favour of the hub and spoke model, but now Government guidance reiterates this, I cannot see it being likely that any operator would extend a service on an already heavily over-bussed corridor.
It is difficult to quantify how many extra passengers you would carry by offering a direct service like this, but in my own opinion I think it is unlikely that you will generate an extra £100k in revenue to pay for the extra bus (assuming it can be done in one bus - this could even be two).
.... should then describe in outline how you and operators propose to deliver the key goals of the Bus Strategy in your area.
These are making services:
- more frequent, with turn-up-and-go services on major routes and feeder or demand-responsive services to lower-density places.
- faster and more reliable, with bus priority wherever necessary and where there is room. - cheaper, with more low, flat fares in towns and cities, lower point-to-point fares elsewhere, and more daily price capping everywhere.
- more comprehensive, with overprovision on a few corridors reduced to boost provision elsewhere and better services in the evenings and weekends, not necessarily with conventional buses.
- easier to understand, with simpler routes, common numbering, co-ordinated timetable change dates, good publicity, and comprehensive information online.
- easier to use, with common tickets, passes and daily capping across all operators, simpler fares, contactless payment and protection of bus stations.
- better integrated with other modes and each other, including more bus-rail interchange and integration and inter-bus transfers.
(20 Dec 2021, 10:11 am)Dan From reading the BSIP, I think the argument here would be that you're adding resource into a service unnecessarily which would duplicate the offering of other services on this corridor.
The days of direct bus services here, there and everywhere are gone. Operators had already started to move away from this in favour of the hub and spoke model, but now Government guidance reiterates this, I cannot see it being likely that any operator would extend a service on an already heavily over-bussed corridor.
It is difficult to quantify how many extra passengers you would carry by offering a direct service like this, but in my own opinion I think it is unlikely that you will generate an extra £100k in revenue to pay for the extra bus (assuming it can be done in one bus - this could even be two).
.... should then describe in outline how you and operators propose to deliver the key goals of the Bus Strategy in your area.
These are making services:
- more frequent, with turn-up-and-go services on major routes and feeder or demand-responsive services to lower-density places.
- faster and more reliable, with bus priority wherever necessary and where there is room. - cheaper, with more low, flat fares in towns and cities, lower point-to-point fares elsewhere, and more daily price capping everywhere.
- more comprehensive, with overprovision on a few corridors reduced to boost provision elsewhere and better services in the evenings and weekends, not necessarily with conventional buses.
- easier to understand, with simpler routes, common numbering, co-ordinated timetable change dates, good publicity, and comprehensive information online.
- easier to use, with common tickets, passes and daily capping across all operators, simpler fares, contactless payment and protection of bus stations.
- better integrated with other modes and each other, including more bus-rail interchange and integration and inter-bus transfers.
Buses must also work better with each other. There are many instances of poor connections and uncoordinated timetables. Bus Service Improvement Plans should detail plans for ensuring that in places (often rural) where services are regular, but not frequent, connectivity is maximised. Hub models can connect services, with buses all arriving and departing at the hub town within the same ten or fifteen-minute window each hour, ideally all servicing the same centrally located bus or railway station.
Bus Service Improvement Plans should consider whether to simplify routes; for example, considering whether networks should have more high-frequency major route services rather than lots of low-frequency services combining. Route variations and letter suffix routes should be reduced.
Networks often try to provide infrequent through services to everywhere or divert buses away from the main route to serve smaller places, reducing speed and convenience for people travelling between a route’s major points. As described, on high-frequency services more use could instead be made of good hub-and-spoke connections, with frequent feeder buses connecting into frequent major routes and through ticketing. This becomes possible if frequency and reliability improve.
It's mentioned in the Bus Back Better document:
Buses must also work better with each other. There are many instances of poor connections and uncoordinated timetables. Bus Service Improvement Plans should detail plans for ensuring that in places (often rural) where services are regular, but not frequent, connectivity is maximised. Hub models can connect services, with buses all arriving and departing at the hub town within the same ten or fifteen-minute window each hour, ideally all servicing the same centrally located bus or railway station.
Bus Service Improvement Plans should consider whether to simplify routes; for example, considering whether networks should have more high-frequency major route services rather than lots of low-frequency services combining. Route variations and letter suffix routes should be reduced.
Networks often try to provide infrequent through services to everywhere or divert buses away from the main route to serve smaller places, reducing speed and convenience for people travelling between a route’s major points. As described, on high-frequency services more use could instead be made of good hub-and-spoke connections, with frequent feeder buses connecting into frequent major routes and through ticketing. This becomes possible if frequency and reliability improve.
(20 Dec 2021, 11:14 am)cainebj It's mentioned in the Bus Back Better document:
Bus Back Better
While it doesn't specifically say the model is to be used, prevent duplication or create new cross town links, authorities are widely interpreting it to focus on connections rather than adapting/extending services to serve additional areas where a service already exists.
(20 Dec 2021, 11:14 am)cainebj It's mentioned in the Bus Back Better document:
Bus Back Better
While it doesn't specifically say the model is to be used, prevent duplication or create new cross town links, authorities are widely interpreting it to focus on connections rather than adapting/extending services to serve additional areas where a service already exists.
The 18 scrapped would be a good idea barley see anyone it unless it got funded I don’t see it lasting any longer
(20 Dec 2021, 12:22 pm)ThomasBooth123 The 18 scrapped would be a good idea barley see anyone it unless it got funded I don’t see it lasting any longer
(20 Dec 2021, 12:22 pm)ThomasBooth123 The 18 scrapped would be a good idea barley see anyone it unless it got funded I don’t see it lasting any longer
