(01 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm)mb134 wrote Quite surprised that Virgin Trains haven't posted a picture on their Facebook page, given that the fact they now operate the service is quite a big deal for them?
Is there a reason for the sort of secrecy behind this livery?
)
(01 Mar 2015, 3:46 pm)Robert wrote No, there is no reason behind the secrecy and there are a couple inconsistencies in Tommy's story which suggests that he could just be making it up to get us going.Ahh I thought the train with the new livery was meant to enter service today, 91103 or something? Which was why I was a bit puzzled as to why they hadn't posted it on social media, and as to why there were no other pictures of it anywhere.
Him saying 'that's all i can say' suggests that is a secret. However, if it was a secret, would the company (or whoever took the photo) wouldn't have released it out to this unknown enthusiast who has then shared it (or just shown it) to Tommy which has given him the knowledge of what the livery looks like. The fact that the livery is going to go public tomorrow when the first train enters service just makes it even more pointless to keep it hidden. One could argue that we only need to wait 24 hours which is correct but surely releasing the train's appearance 24 hours in advance isn't going to hurt too much either.
This is just my opinion and no hard feelings should be drawn from it but as Tommy isn't a reliable source, he isn't naming his source (who has supposedly asked to remain anonymous) which makes it difficult for me to believe, i am going to chose not to believe it. You wouldn't go to court without evidence so i don't think this should be any different (only its not a court, obviously
)
(01 Mar 2015, 3:46 pm)Robert wrote No, there is no reason behind the secrecy and there are a couple inconsistencies in Tommy's story which suggests that he could just be making it up to get us going.
Him saying 'that's all i can say' suggests that is a secret. However, if it was a secret, would the company (or whoever took the photo) wouldn't have released it out to this unknown enthusiast who has then shared it (or just shown it) to Tommy which has given him the knowledge of what the livery looks like. The fact that the livery is going to go public tomorrow when the first train enters service just makes it even more pointless to keep it hidden. One could argue that we only need to wait 24 hours which is correct but surely releasing the train's appearance 24 hours in advance isn't going to hurt too much either.
This is just my opinion and no hard feelings should be drawn from it but as Tommy isn't a reliable source, he isn't naming his source (who has supposedly asked to remain anonymous) which makes it difficult for me to believe, i am going to chose not to believe it. You wouldn't go to court without evidence so i don't think this should be any different (only its not a court, obviously
(01 Mar 2015, 6:14 pm)MurdnunoC wrote While I'm not going to speculate on whether Tommy is a reliable source or whether is story is true, we must remember that people have the right not to disclose sources and exercise that right for a number of reasons.
Other forum members have access to inside information despite not being directly (or currently) employedwithin the public transport sector. Presumably, this information comes from [a] source(s) who wish to remain anonymous otherwise the source(s) in question could easily post information without any third-party involvement. If Tommy's source, whomever it is, has asked to remain anonymous we must respect that just like we respect the anonymity of those who provide information to other forum members.
Time will tell whether Tommy is right or wrong.
Aircraft flown on:
744, 77W, 772, E145, E190, E170, E175, E195, A319, A320, A320NEO, A321, A321NEO, A330-200, A330-300, A340-600 763, 752, 733, 737, 738, CRJ900, CRJ1000
Favourite aircraft: G-STBL/G-ZBKL
(02 Mar 2015, 5:57 pm)Tommy_1581 wrote So it turns out that I'm correct.
Next time that someone tells you about new liveries, don't start mouthing off.
91124 was on the 1100 KGX - Edinburgh today, along with a full set. Many were expecting 91103.
(02 Mar 2015, 6:02 pm)Dan wrote I wouldn't take it to heart, Tommy.
When citaro5284 first started posting little bites of information on the forum, not a lot of people believed him as they did not know he had access to "insider information", as it were. As time has progressed and more of what he has suggested has happened, people have began to appreciate that he is a reputable source.
(02 Mar 2015, 5:57 pm)Tommy_1581 wrote So it turns out that I'm correct.
Next time that someone tells you about new liveries, don't start mouthing off.
91124 was on the 1100 KGX - Edinburgh today, along with a full set. Many were expecting 91103.
(02 Mar 2015, 6:03 pm)Tommy_1581 wrote Don't start, how on bloody earth could I guess details of a livery.
(02 Mar 2015, 6:37 pm)aureolin wrote People are obviously going to challenge the information if it's vague, or if it doesn't contain a valid source. It's incredibly naive not to challenge such information.
The whole 'cant tell' & 'I'm not allowed to tell you' doesn't help matters either. It's only going to get people's backs up, especially when people know that it's not because you're tied down by commercial confidentiality (i.e. you're not an employee of the company you have information on).
If in doubt, I'd suggest posting your information in the context of "I believe that the new livery will contain a red body with white trim". Sets your statement out as speculation from the offset, and avoids the negative comments you've had.
That's just my opinion though, and like Fozz says, everybody has one!
