Menu
 
North East Buses Local Bus Scene Go North East Go North East: 2014/15 Financial Year Order Predictions

Go North East: 2014/15 Financial Year Order Predictions

Go North East: 2014/15 Financial Year Order Predictions

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
 
Pages (100) Previous 187 88 89100 Next
Michael



19,178
31 Mar 2015, 8:11 pm #1,741
(31 Mar 2015, 7:36 pm)Malarkey I think Go North East would be wanting to offload the remaining 52reg Mini Pointer Darts while they can, so I wouldnt think Solo SRs for the East Durham Network is out of the Question Fozz, keep your fingers and toes crossed Wink , anyway the remaining 52reg MPDs are listed below.

524 - NA52 AWG
536 - NA52 AWY
537 - NA52 AWZ
538 - NA52 AXB
539 - NA52 AXC
541 - NA52 AXF
542 - NA52 AXG
543 - NA52 AXH
544 - NA52 AXJ
545 - NA52 AXK
546 - NA52 AXM
547 - NA52 AXN
548 - NA52 AXO

Alternatively Go North East could give them a Full Internal Refurb and do some more Eminox Modifications to boost there Euro Rating, maybe even retrofit a Flybrid System to them also and have them running for many years to come, who am I kidding ehh.

Those 13 could easily be withdrawn with a decent sized Solo order... hopefully that happens, wouldn't mind seeing a better version of East Durham or North Tyne Links.

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
31 Mar 2015, 8:11 pm #1,741

(31 Mar 2015, 7:36 pm)Malarkey I think Go North East would be wanting to offload the remaining 52reg Mini Pointer Darts while they can, so I wouldnt think Solo SRs for the East Durham Network is out of the Question Fozz, keep your fingers and toes crossed Wink , anyway the remaining 52reg MPDs are listed below.

524 - NA52 AWG
536 - NA52 AWY
537 - NA52 AWZ
538 - NA52 AXB
539 - NA52 AXC
541 - NA52 AXF
542 - NA52 AXG
543 - NA52 AXH
544 - NA52 AXJ
545 - NA52 AXK
546 - NA52 AXM
547 - NA52 AXN
548 - NA52 AXO

Alternatively Go North East could give them a Full Internal Refurb and do some more Eminox Modifications to boost there Euro Rating, maybe even retrofit a Flybrid System to them also and have them running for many years to come, who am I kidding ehh.

Those 13 could easily be withdrawn with a decent sized Solo order... hopefully that happens, wouldn't mind seeing a better version of East Durham or North Tyne Links.


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

Malarkey



6,064
31 Mar 2015, 8:53 pm #1,742
(31 Mar 2015, 8:11 pm)Michael Those 13 could easily be withdrawn with a decent sized Solo order... hopefully that happens, wouldn't mind seeing a better version of East Durham or North Tyne Links.
Potential investment in Solos for the East Durham Network would also free up MPDs 560/562/564/565/573/574/618 and 619, which could replace 8247/8248/8250/8251/8252 at Washington, with 8253/8254 and 8255 from Washington and two Solars off the X66 replacing 8242/8243/8244/8245/8246 at Riverside, This would result in the 52reg Wright Cadets all being Withdrawn from Service.

#MalarkeyIsAManWithAPlan
#HashtagsOnNEB
Malarkey
31 Mar 2015, 8:53 pm #1,742

(31 Mar 2015, 8:11 pm)Michael Those 13 could easily be withdrawn with a decent sized Solo order... hopefully that happens, wouldn't mind seeing a better version of East Durham or North Tyne Links.
Potential investment in Solos for the East Durham Network would also free up MPDs 560/562/564/565/573/574/618 and 619, which could replace 8247/8248/8250/8251/8252 at Washington, with 8253/8254 and 8255 from Washington and two Solars off the X66 replacing 8242/8243/8244/8245/8246 at Riverside, This would result in the 52reg Wright Cadets all being Withdrawn from Service.

#MalarkeyIsAManWithAPlan
#HashtagsOnNEB

Michael



19,178
31 Mar 2015, 8:58 pm #1,743
(31 Mar 2015, 8:53 pm)Malarkey Potential investment in Solos for the East Durham Network would also free up MPDs 560/562/564/565/573/574/618 and 619, which could replace 8247/8248/8250/8251/8252 at Washington, with 8253/8254 and 8255 from Washington and two Solars off the X66 replacing 8242/8243/8244/8245/8246 at Riverside, This would result in the 52reg Wright Cadets all being Withdrawn from Service.

#MalarkeyIsAManWithAPlan
#HashtagsOnNEB

I'm not sure GNE would want to replace the Cadet's with MPD's, means loss of seats... although that's good for services like the 82/82A which hardly has anyone on...

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
31 Mar 2015, 8:58 pm #1,743

(31 Mar 2015, 8:53 pm)Malarkey Potential investment in Solos for the East Durham Network would also free up MPDs 560/562/564/565/573/574/618 and 619, which could replace 8247/8248/8250/8251/8252 at Washington, with 8253/8254 and 8255 from Washington and two Solars off the X66 replacing 8242/8243/8244/8245/8246 at Riverside, This would result in the 52reg Wright Cadets all being Withdrawn from Service.

#MalarkeyIsAManWithAPlan
#HashtagsOnNEB

I'm not sure GNE would want to replace the Cadet's with MPD's, means loss of seats... although that's good for services like the 82/82A which hardly has anyone on...


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

Malarkey



6,064
31 Mar 2015, 9:13 pm #1,744
(31 Mar 2015, 8:58 pm)Michael I'm not sure GNE would want to replace the Cadet's with MPD's, means loss of seats... although that's good for services like the 82/82A which hardly has anyone on...

With the exception of peak time Journeys and the obvious service cut at both ends of the route (Heworth/Birtley), I would say Passenger Numbers have gone down dramatically and that the 82/82A would cope just fine with MPDs, as they did in the 10 Years prior to there removal from Service.
Malarkey
31 Mar 2015, 9:13 pm #1,744

(31 Mar 2015, 8:58 pm)Michael I'm not sure GNE would want to replace the Cadet's with MPD's, means loss of seats... although that's good for services like the 82/82A which hardly has anyone on...

With the exception of peak time Journeys and the obvious service cut at both ends of the route (Heworth/Birtley), I would say Passenger Numbers have gone down dramatically and that the 82/82A would cope just fine with MPDs, as they did in the 10 Years prior to there removal from Service.

Davie

Banned

2,783
31 Mar 2015, 9:19 pm #1,745
(31 Mar 2015, 9:13 pm)Malarkey With the exception of peak time Journeys and the obvious service cut at both ends of the route (Heworth/Birtley), I would say Passenger Numbers have gone down dramatically and that the 82/82A would cope just fine with MPDs, as they did in the 10 Years prior to there removal from Service.

II'd like to see Go north east invest in some Optare Solo SR's for the 82 and 82A to replace the Cadets.  I hight doubt this would  happen though 
Davie
31 Mar 2015, 9:19 pm #1,745

(31 Mar 2015, 9:13 pm)Malarkey With the exception of peak time Journeys and the obvious service cut at both ends of the route (Heworth/Birtley), I would say Passenger Numbers have gone down dramatically and that the 82/82A would cope just fine with MPDs, as they did in the 10 Years prior to there removal from Service.

II'd like to see Go north east invest in some Optare Solo SR's for the 82 and 82A to replace the Cadets.  I hight doubt this would  happen though 

Malarkey



6,064
31 Mar 2015, 9:43 pm #1,746
(31 Mar 2015, 9:19 pm)Davie II'd like to see Go north east invest in some Optare Solo SR's for the 82 and 82A to replace the Cadets.  I hight doubt this would  happen though 
Problem with that is the Services cant even justify the Cost of such an Investment, which is why the Cadets got put on the 82/82A in the first place as it is a Loss Making Service, as are the 85/86, it has been well documented and rumored in the past that the Quaylink Versas would cascade onto the Washington Locals, but nothing materialised and likely wont with the upcoming Quaylink Service Changes, I would therefore like to think perhaps the Orbit Versas or the Nexus Solo SRs would cascade over in the future, by future I mean 2016 or 17 which is a while away yet.
Malarkey
31 Mar 2015, 9:43 pm #1,746

(31 Mar 2015, 9:19 pm)Davie II'd like to see Go north east invest in some Optare Solo SR's for the 82 and 82A to replace the Cadets.  I hight doubt this would  happen though 
Problem with that is the Services cant even justify the Cost of such an Investment, which is why the Cadets got put on the 82/82A in the first place as it is a Loss Making Service, as are the 85/86, it has been well documented and rumored in the past that the Quaylink Versas would cascade onto the Washington Locals, but nothing materialised and likely wont with the upcoming Quaylink Service Changes, I would therefore like to think perhaps the Orbit Versas or the Nexus Solo SRs would cascade over in the future, by future I mean 2016 or 17 which is a while away yet.

Davie

Banned

2,783
31 Mar 2015, 9:56 pm #1,747
(31 Mar 2015, 9:43 pm)Malarkey Problem with that is the Services cant even justify the Cost of such an Investment, which is why the Cadets got put on the 82/82A in the first place as it is a Loss Making Service, as are the 85/86, it has been well documented and rumored in the past that the Quaylink Versas would cascade onto the Washington Locals, but nothing materialised and likely wont with the upcoming Quaylink Service Changes, I would therefore like to think perhaps the Orbit Versas or the Nexus Solo SRs would cascade over in the future, by future I mean 2016 or 17 which is a while away yet.

Aye good point. I totally agree with what you said earlier  but the MPDS, I think they'd be good for them services 
Edited 31 Mar 2015, 9:57 pm by Davie.
Davie
31 Mar 2015, 9:56 pm #1,747

(31 Mar 2015, 9:43 pm)Malarkey Problem with that is the Services cant even justify the Cost of such an Investment, which is why the Cadets got put on the 82/82A in the first place as it is a Loss Making Service, as are the 85/86, it has been well documented and rumored in the past that the Quaylink Versas would cascade onto the Washington Locals, but nothing materialised and likely wont with the upcoming Quaylink Service Changes, I would therefore like to think perhaps the Orbit Versas or the Nexus Solo SRs would cascade over in the future, by future I mean 2016 or 17 which is a while away yet.

Aye good point. I totally agree with what you said earlier  but the MPDS, I think they'd be good for them services 

Dan

Site Administrator

18,128
01 Apr 2015, 5:20 am #1,748
(31 Mar 2015, 9:43 pm)Malarkey Problem with that is the Services cant even justify the Cost of such an Investment, which is why the Cadets got put on the 82/82A in the first place as it is a Loss Making Service, as are the 85/86, it has been well documented and rumored in the past that the Quaylink Versas would cascade onto the Washington Locals, but nothing materialised and likely wont with the upcoming Quaylink Service Changes, I would therefore like to think perhaps the Orbit Versas or the Nexus Solo SRs would cascade over in the future, by future I mean 2016 or 17 which is a while away yet.

I don't know where you've all got this idea from that the 82/82A services are loss-making... If they were, why would they exist (in whichever form they take?)

I think the Cadets were moved from the 88/88A to keep them more local, as there was concerns with reliability on the South Tyne services. It also UPGRADED services M2/M3 (at the time) to provide vehicles with a larger capacity, and the Cadets are much more reliable for short journeys in and around Washington...
Dan
01 Apr 2015, 5:20 am #1,748

(31 Mar 2015, 9:43 pm)Malarkey Problem with that is the Services cant even justify the Cost of such an Investment, which is why the Cadets got put on the 82/82A in the first place as it is a Loss Making Service, as are the 85/86, it has been well documented and rumored in the past that the Quaylink Versas would cascade onto the Washington Locals, but nothing materialised and likely wont with the upcoming Quaylink Service Changes, I would therefore like to think perhaps the Orbit Versas or the Nexus Solo SRs would cascade over in the future, by future I mean 2016 or 17 which is a while away yet.

I don't know where you've all got this idea from that the 82/82A services are loss-making... If they were, why would they exist (in whichever form they take?)

I think the Cadets were moved from the 88/88A to keep them more local, as there was concerns with reliability on the South Tyne services. It also UPGRADED services M2/M3 (at the time) to provide vehicles with a larger capacity, and the Cadets are much more reliable for short journeys in and around Washington...

01 Apr 2015, 10:42 am #1,749
Tomorrow, I think I'll ride the 82/82A once or twice on my travels... Make my own judgement on their reliability! Wink
Edited 01 Apr 2015, 10:42 am by R852 PRG.
R852 PRG
01 Apr 2015, 10:42 am #1,749

Tomorrow, I think I'll ride the 82/82A once or twice on my travels... Make my own judgement on their reliability! Wink

Michael



19,178
01 Apr 2015, 10:44 am #1,750
(01 Apr 2015, 10:42 am)MarcTheA4 Tomorrow, I think I'll ride the 82/82A once or twice on my travels... Make my own judgement on their reliability! Wink

Make note of passenger numbers to. =)

Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.
Michael
01 Apr 2015, 10:44 am #1,750

(01 Apr 2015, 10:42 am)MarcTheA4 Tomorrow, I think I'll ride the 82/82A once or twice on my travels... Make my own judgement on their reliability! Wink

Make note of passenger numbers to. =)


Ooo Friend, Bus Friend.

LeeCalder



1,928
01 Apr 2015, 10:53 am #1,751
No way are Solo SR's big enough for peak times... There are standees on the Cadets! It seems only regular users of the 82 only realise this though. All this talk of putting smaller buses is in my opinion silly
LeeCalder
01 Apr 2015, 10:53 am #1,751

No way are Solo SR's big enough for peak times... There are standees on the Cadets! It seems only regular users of the 82 only realise this though. All this talk of putting smaller buses is in my opinion silly

01 Apr 2015, 11:00 am #1,752
I think Go North East have this allocation because they see the passenger numbers justify it. As has been said by more than one person before - Go North East know how many passengers use their services.

Granted, having standees at peak times (taking Lee's word for it - never experienced it myself) is not the best of things, but surely it's not the worst of things either; all buses have dedicated room for standees, so they should be catered for regardless of whether or not they can get a seat. The only real problem, in my opinion, is when passengers are refused travel due to so many passengers.
Edited 01 Apr 2015, 11:01 am by R852 PRG.
R852 PRG
01 Apr 2015, 11:00 am #1,752

I think Go North East have this allocation because they see the passenger numbers justify it. As has been said by more than one person before - Go North East know how many passengers use their services.

Granted, having standees at peak times (taking Lee's word for it - never experienced it myself) is not the best of things, but surely it's not the worst of things either; all buses have dedicated room for standees, so they should be catered for regardless of whether or not they can get a seat. The only real problem, in my opinion, is when passengers are refused travel due to so many passengers.

LeeCalder



1,928
01 Apr 2015, 11:05 am #1,753
The problem is though most 82 passengers are elderly and cannot stand
LeeCalder
01 Apr 2015, 11:05 am #1,753

The problem is though most 82 passengers are elderly and cannot stand

01 Apr 2015, 11:27 am #1,754
(01 Apr 2015, 11:05 am)leestransportphotos The problem is though most 82 passengers are elderly and cannot stand

Same case with nearly all services, though. Wink
R852 PRG
01 Apr 2015, 11:27 am #1,754

(01 Apr 2015, 11:05 am)leestransportphotos The problem is though most 82 passengers are elderly and cannot stand

Same case with nearly all services, though. Wink

01 Apr 2015, 11:45 am #1,755
(01 Apr 2015, 11:05 am)leestransportphotos The problem is though most 82 passengers are elderly and cannot stand

It really comes round to whatever they have in the depot, it's a mixed allocation just like the Arriva 35/35A, I don't really like them putting StreetLites on a busy service of which requires a double decker, but I can live with it.

In the end of the day, if the 82/82A is a loss making service, then GNE may consider running it at peak times only with a double decker. Then if the local residents complain, GNE can just say that they should have used the bus during the day. Maybe a local independant can take over the daytime journeys.
omnicity4659
01 Apr 2015, 11:45 am #1,755

(01 Apr 2015, 11:05 am)leestransportphotos The problem is though most 82 passengers are elderly and cannot stand

It really comes round to whatever they have in the depot, it's a mixed allocation just like the Arriva 35/35A, I don't really like them putting StreetLites on a busy service of which requires a double decker, but I can live with it.

In the end of the day, if the 82/82A is a loss making service, then GNE may consider running it at peak times only with a double decker. Then if the local residents complain, GNE can just say that they should have used the bus during the day. Maybe a local independant can take over the daytime journeys.

Dan

Site Administrator

18,128
01 Apr 2015, 11:48 am #1,756
(01 Apr 2015, 11:45 am)Tommy_1581 It really comes round to whatever they have in the depot, it's a mixed allocation just like the Arriva 35/35A, I don't really like them putting StreetLites on a busy service of which requires a double decker, but I can live with it.

In the end of the day, if the 82/82A is a loss making service, then GNE may consider running it at peak times only with a double decker. Then if the local residents complain, GNE can just say that they should have used the bus during the day. Maybe a local independant can take over the daytime journeys.

It's not a mixed allocation... It's allocated DAF SB120/Wright Cadet vehicles.

As there are no spare Cadets at Washington, or if one is VOR or wrongly allocated elsewhere, other vehicles can be allocated.
Dan
01 Apr 2015, 11:48 am #1,756

(01 Apr 2015, 11:45 am)Tommy_1581 It really comes round to whatever they have in the depot, it's a mixed allocation just like the Arriva 35/35A, I don't really like them putting StreetLites on a busy service of which requires a double decker, but I can live with it.

In the end of the day, if the 82/82A is a loss making service, then GNE may consider running it at peak times only with a double decker. Then if the local residents complain, GNE can just say that they should have used the bus during the day. Maybe a local independant can take over the daytime journeys.

It's not a mixed allocation... It's allocated DAF SB120/Wright Cadet vehicles.

As there are no spare Cadets at Washington, or if one is VOR or wrongly allocated elsewhere, other vehicles can be allocated.

01 Apr 2015, 11:51 am #1,757
(01 Apr 2015, 11:48 am)Dan It's not a mixed allocation... It's allocated DAF SB120/Wright Cadet vehicles.

As there are no spare Cadets at Washington, or if one is VOR or wrongly allocated elsewhere, other vehicles can be allocated.

Ah right, just every time I see the 82 it's got a MPD or a Cadet on them. Saying that only two passengers were on the 82 that I saw yesterday.
omnicity4659
01 Apr 2015, 11:51 am #1,757

(01 Apr 2015, 11:48 am)Dan It's not a mixed allocation... It's allocated DAF SB120/Wright Cadet vehicles.

As there are no spare Cadets at Washington, or if one is VOR or wrongly allocated elsewhere, other vehicles can be allocated.

Ah right, just every time I see the 82 it's got a MPD or a Cadet on them. Saying that only two passengers were on the 82 that I saw yesterday.

S813 FVK



6,030
01 Apr 2015, 11:56 am #1,758
(01 Apr 2015, 11:51 am)Tommy_1581 Ah right, just every time I see the 82 it's got a MPD or a Cadet on them. Saying that only two passengers were on the 82 that I saw yesterday.

The MPDs should be allocated to the 85/86.
S813 FVK
01 Apr 2015, 11:56 am #1,758

(01 Apr 2015, 11:51 am)Tommy_1581 Ah right, just every time I see the 82 it's got a MPD or a Cadet on them. Saying that only two passengers were on the 82 that I saw yesterday.

The MPDs should be allocated to the 85/86.

Adrian



9,597
01 Apr 2015, 11:57 am #1,759
(01 Apr 2015, 11:51 am)Tommy_1581 Ah right, just every time I see the 82 it's got a MPD or a Cadet on them. Saying that only two passengers were on the 82 that I saw yesterday.

Depends where you see it. The Galleries to Concord stretch is busier than the Birtley to The Galleries stretch for example.

Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook
Adrian
01 Apr 2015, 11:57 am #1,759

(01 Apr 2015, 11:51 am)Tommy_1581 Ah right, just every time I see the 82 it's got a MPD or a Cadet on them. Saying that only two passengers were on the 82 that I saw yesterday.

Depends where you see it. The Galleries to Concord stretch is busier than the Birtley to The Galleries stretch for example.


Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook

Andreos1



14,261
01 Apr 2015, 12:22 pm #1,760
(01 Apr 2015, 11:45 am)Tommy_1581 It really comes round to whatever they have in the depot, it's a mixed allocation just like the Arriva 35/35A, I don't really like them putting StreetLites on a busy service of which requires a double decker, but I can live with it.

In the end of the day, if the 82/82A is a loss making service, then GNE may consider running it at peak times only with a double decker. Then if the local residents complain, GNE can just say that they should have used the bus during the day. Maybe a local independant can take over the daytime journeys.

Washington only have a few different vehicle types, so it doesn't take much for anything else to appear on it.

I believe the '4' branded Merc's are the only ones stabled at Washington currently, that haven't ran the route.

Cadets and MPD's seem to be the vehicle of choice.
B7 and B9 deckers have appeared, as have Versa's and Solar's.
Edited 01 Apr 2015, 12:22 pm by Andreos1.

'Illegitimis non carborundum'
Andreos1
01 Apr 2015, 12:22 pm #1,760

(01 Apr 2015, 11:45 am)Tommy_1581 It really comes round to whatever they have in the depot, it's a mixed allocation just like the Arriva 35/35A, I don't really like them putting StreetLites on a busy service of which requires a double decker, but I can live with it.

In the end of the day, if the 82/82A is a loss making service, then GNE may consider running it at peak times only with a double decker. Then if the local residents complain, GNE can just say that they should have used the bus during the day. Maybe a local independant can take over the daytime journeys.

Washington only have a few different vehicle types, so it doesn't take much for anything else to appear on it.

I believe the '4' branded Merc's are the only ones stabled at Washington currently, that haven't ran the route.

Cadets and MPD's seem to be the vehicle of choice.
B7 and B9 deckers have appeared, as have Versa's and Solar's.


'Illegitimis non carborundum'

Pages (100) Previous 187 88 89100 Next
 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average