(05 Aug 2022, 5:31 pm)N1cholas wrote Think health and safety would stop that ever happening, would also be a security risk for unknown people just popping in to charge the car
It'd be no different from any other public rapid charger site though
Skip to main content
(05 Aug 2022, 2:38 pm)streetdeckfan wrote Slightly unrelated, and not sure if it's been asked before, but since they just use standard CCS chargers, presumably those chargers can be used on any vehicles.
Therefore, could it not be a good idea to open them up for public use, for a charge of course? There might be more money in that than actually running buses!
(05 Aug 2022, 5:43 pm)Malarkey wrote I think with a lack of charging points across the region the local councils should look at opening up car parks for electric charging vehicles or having dedicated spaces made available in existing car parks to make it more accessible for the public, it would like spur on a change for those driving petrol/diesel to switch to electric but achieve that the councils need to invest first which they are reluctant to do.
(05 Aug 2022, 5:41 pm)streetdeckfan wrote It'd be no different from any other public rapid charger site thoughThe chargers are on private land and would have to install security fencing so that tom, dick and harry dont just go for a wonder around the depot and into places they shouldnt be, it would happen also what would happen if a bus needed to be brought back to park up in the area if had cars parked on the charging point? would be a better idea to install electric charging points in the car park for people to use
(05 Aug 2022, 5:58 pm)N1cholas wrote The chargers are on private land and would have to install security fencing so that tom, dick and harry dont just go for a wonder around the depot and into places they shouldnt be, it would happen also what would happen if a bus needed to be brought back to park up in the area if had cars parked on the charging point? would be a better idea to install electric charging points in the car park for people to use
(05 Aug 2022, 2:38 pm)streetdeckfan wrote Slightly unrelated, and not sure if it's been asked before, but since they just use standard CCS chargers, presumably those chargers can be used on any vehicles.Not sure about that. The pay for charging points outside fram greggs barely get used - and that's an increase in activity from the never get used of their first couple of years.
Therefore, could it not be a good idea to open them up for public use, for a charge of course? There might be more money in that than actually running buses!
(15 Aug 2022, 2:13 pm)ne14ne1 wrote Still hopeful the QuayCity name remains (although QuayLink was better), however if it’s dropped in favour of Voltra, then surely the Q prefix will be meaningless and they could’ve went for 3A and 3B.
A couple of weeks max until we find out.
(16 Aug 2022, 2:29 pm)citaro5284 wrote https://twitter.com/Dan3942/status/15595...60737?s=20&t=c5GXmQaja0xM4yrN6ZN6GA
(08 Jul 2022, 3:53 pm)Unber43 wrote the awful display for next stops etc, where the wheelchairs go, it blocks the entire view down the bus.What a shame for you, I would rather it block the view and allow wheelchair user to see the next stop. You can still have a view just sit on the other side
(16 Aug 2022, 2:42 pm)F114TML wrote Wonder if Voltra, therefore, is going to be their name for the actual vehicles - similar to "LNER Azuma", "Virgin Voyager" and "Inter-City 125"Do we know the rest of the F/Ns and reg's for the new batch? sor far we have NL72 EUE and NL72 ETT
(16 Aug 2022, 2:26 pm)Jack Gill wrote By the looks of things, it's at least kept the first part of it's name 'quay' judging by the picture Dan posted on twitter, however can't really see what it says after that.Could be QuayElectric?
(16 Aug 2022, 3:16 pm)adavies3774 wrote What a shame for you, I would rather it block the view and allow wheelchair user to see the next stop. You can still have a view just sit on the other side
Do we know the rest of the F/Ns and reg's for the new batch? sor far we have NL72 EUE and NL72 ETT
Could be QuayElectric?
(16 Aug 2022, 2:42 pm)Ambassador wrote I assume the bus is in darkness for some weird marketing photography impact and not because its been short notice cancelledCannot afford to flip the switch with today's energy prices.
(16 Aug 2022, 4:17 pm)Adrian wrote Cannot afford to flip the switch with today's energy prices.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
(16 Aug 2022, 4:18 pm)streetdeckfan wrote Do GNE have any solar on their depots?
(16 Aug 2022, 4:29 pm)Adrian wrote No, I don't think so. I wonder if it has ever been considered for Riverside, given the roof space that could be utilised.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
(16 Aug 2022, 2:29 pm)citaro5284 wrote https://twitter.com/Dan3942/status/15595...60737?s=20&t=c5GXmQaja0xM4yrN6ZN6GAAll I'm seeing is this
(17 Aug 2022, 9:28 am)Adrian wrote I mean joking aside, but are we really going down the route of singing and dancing about the launch of VOLTRA 2?
If so, then how do you do this positively, against a backdrop of network decimation in July, followed by more (alleged temporary) service cuts in a couple weeks time? It reminds me of VOLTRA being bragged about in the September 2021 'Buses fit for the future' glossy brochure, at the same time as telling some people that they no longer have a bus service. It all feels a bit perverse.