(21 Aug 2024, 3:36 pm)Storx wrote In fairness, it's much of the same really and they're both as bad as each other. Not sure what is has to do with GoNorthEast though, what'aboutery at it's finest.BSIP propping up 'goldmines' is completely unacceptable. Arriva Northumbria & Northumberland CC have used the funding pretty well and actually secured some decent links such as the improved 57/57A (minus the Solos), 43 extension to Morpeth etc.
Anything that's a 'goldmine' or core route, should be ran fully commercially (or mostly) for 1 year with an increased frequency....then if deemed non-profitable despite being socially essential / demand warranted, then BSIP comes in at that point paying for any losses incurred during the 1 year trial + future funding.
For BSIP funding, GNE's priorities should've been:
- Restoring a faster Newcastle to Lanchester link whilst restoring links from West & South Stanley to Gateshead
- Better evening & Sunday service on X73 Stanley to MetroCentre only
- Blackhill - Quicker peak time journeys on X70/X71 or maybe an all day extension of one of the services
- Faster Tyne Valley to Newcastle service (11/604) instead of propping up the 10/10A/10B
- 25/725 restored to full route
Wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if GNE end up using BSIP to try and restore the X9.....but that comes with other issues such as lack of suitable vehicles being available....which can't be resolved unless changes are made in Derwentside to either routes, interworking patterns or vehicle allocations (some boards being changed to single deck).