Menu
 
North East Buses Local Bus Scene Arriva North East Arriva North East: Latest News & Discussion - May 2015

Arriva North East: Latest News & Discussion - May 2015

Arriva North East: Latest News & Discussion - May 2015

 
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
 
Pages (25) Previous 122 23 24 25 Next
Kuyoyo



6,856
31 May 2015, 4:35 pm #441
(18 May 2015, 5:55 pm)tyresmoke 1464 and 1465 have gone temporarily to Blyth to help flush their Quorum Geminis out for MAX refurbishment (X4/X5)

A number of VDL SB200/Wright Pulsar 2 vehicles are currently on loan to Blyth Depot. The confirmed examples to have entered service temporarily at Blyth are as follows:

- 1457 (NK10 CGF)
- 1464 (NK61 CXV)
- 1465 (NK61 CXW)
- 1491 (NK61 CZE)
It is thought that these vehicles are being allocated to Blyth Depot temporarily to allow their "Quorum Express" liveried VDL DB300/Wright Eclipse Gemini 2 vehicles to be converted to "MAX" specification. It is thought that they will continue to be allocated to services X4/X5.

Just to flag this up, 1457/64/91 have not left Stockton for Blyth. The actual vehicles at Blyth are reportedly 1465/6.
Kuyoyo
31 May 2015, 4:35 pm #441

(18 May 2015, 5:55 pm)tyresmoke 1464 and 1465 have gone temporarily to Blyth to help flush their Quorum Geminis out for MAX refurbishment (X4/X5)

A number of VDL SB200/Wright Pulsar 2 vehicles are currently on loan to Blyth Depot. The confirmed examples to have entered service temporarily at Blyth are as follows:

- 1457 (NK10 CGF)
- 1464 (NK61 CXV)
- 1465 (NK61 CXW)
- 1491 (NK61 CZE)
It is thought that these vehicles are being allocated to Blyth Depot temporarily to allow their "Quorum Express" liveried VDL DB300/Wright Eclipse Gemini 2 vehicles to be converted to "MAX" specification. It is thought that they will continue to be allocated to services X4/X5.

Just to flag this up, 1457/64/91 have not left Stockton for Blyth. The actual vehicles at Blyth are reportedly 1465/6.

Dan

Site Administrator

18,128
31 May 2015, 4:35 pm #442
(31 May 2015, 4:30 pm)Jimmi 1517 looks the worst as it has nothing applied above it.

Also saw 1520 yesterday and it looked to still have Barclays? bank Darlington behind the drivers cab.

It wasn't the exterior sub-branding I was worried about - it was the interior branding. I had anticipated that any anything not Durham related would be removed in favour of something Peterlee or Sunderland related, but this is clearly not the case...
Dan
31 May 2015, 4:35 pm #442

(31 May 2015, 4:30 pm)Jimmi 1517 looks the worst as it has nothing applied above it.

Also saw 1520 yesterday and it looked to still have Barclays? bank Darlington behind the drivers cab.

It wasn't the exterior sub-branding I was worried about - it was the interior branding. I had anticipated that any anything not Durham related would be removed in favour of something Peterlee or Sunderland related, but this is clearly not the case...

mb134



4,162
31 May 2015, 4:38 pm #443
(31 May 2015, 12:55 pm)Tommy_1581 4653 has returned from Thornton's and now carries "Quick links to Newcastle" branding.

Don't really see the point in that branding to be honest, would a simple "MAX" branding not do? Maybe with route numbers?

I find it quite hard to read the following "Quick Links" on the following:
[Image: 18015969449_a2530e1fa7.jpg]Arriva North East: 4650 / NK05 GXD by Jimmi's Bus Photos, on Flickr

And I find the text on this to stand out far better:
[Image: 15285023744_5957122379.jpg]Arriva North East: 4659 / NK05GXO by Daniel Graham, on Flickr

So maybe something to highlight the routes instead, as if a "Quick Links into Newcastle" bus passed you'd have no idea what service you were looking for in the future, as opposed to a "X14 X15 X18" branded one?
mb134
31 May 2015, 4:38 pm #443

(31 May 2015, 12:55 pm)Tommy_1581 4653 has returned from Thornton's and now carries "Quick links to Newcastle" branding.

Don't really see the point in that branding to be honest, would a simple "MAX" branding not do? Maybe with route numbers?

I find it quite hard to read the following "Quick Links" on the following:
[Image: 18015969449_a2530e1fa7.jpg]Arriva North East: 4650 / NK05 GXD by Jimmi's Bus Photos, on Flickr

And I find the text on this to stand out far better:
[Image: 15285023744_5957122379.jpg]Arriva North East: 4659 / NK05GXO by Daniel Graham, on Flickr

So maybe something to highlight the routes instead, as if a "Quick Links into Newcastle" bus passed you'd have no idea what service you were looking for in the future, as opposed to a "X14 X15 X18" branded one?

Dan

Site Administrator

18,128
31 May 2015, 4:40 pm #444
(31 May 2015, 4:35 pm)Kuyoyo Just to flag this up, 1457/64/91 have not left Stockton for Blyth. The actual vehicles at Blyth are reportedly 1465/6.

That's my bad. I used the information on this post, forgetting (at the time) that Stockton had an X5 service too. Clearly put two and two together with others being reported to have migrated up north.

Shall change it at some point this evening.
Dan
31 May 2015, 4:40 pm #444

(31 May 2015, 4:35 pm)Kuyoyo Just to flag this up, 1457/64/91 have not left Stockton for Blyth. The actual vehicles at Blyth are reportedly 1465/6.

That's my bad. I used the information on this post, forgetting (at the time) that Stockton had an X5 service too. Clearly put two and two together with others being reported to have migrated up north.

Shall change it at some point this evening.

Jimmi



10,977
31 May 2015, 4:40 pm #445
(31 May 2015, 4:35 pm)Dan It wasn't the exterior sub-branding I was worried about - it was the interior branding. I had anticipated that any anything not Durham related would be removed in favour of something Peterlee or Sunderland related, but this is clearly not the case...

Yeah sadly it looks to be the case.

If they swapped the Pulsars around so all the ones with Durham based landmarks were based at Belmont and have examples with Darlington and Aycliffe landmarks stay on the 7 they probably wouldn't have had to remove any of them but it would of meant the fleet numbers would have been a mess with different Sapphire brands.
Jimmi
31 May 2015, 4:40 pm #445

(31 May 2015, 4:35 pm)Dan It wasn't the exterior sub-branding I was worried about - it was the interior branding. I had anticipated that any anything not Durham related would be removed in favour of something Peterlee or Sunderland related, but this is clearly not the case...

Yeah sadly it looks to be the case.

If they swapped the Pulsars around so all the ones with Durham based landmarks were based at Belmont and have examples with Darlington and Aycliffe landmarks stay on the 7 they probably wouldn't have had to remove any of them but it would of meant the fleet numbers would have been a mess with different Sapphire brands.

Jimmi



10,977
31 May 2015, 4:45 pm #446
(31 May 2015, 4:38 pm)mb134 Don't really see the point in that branding to be honest, would a simple "MAX" branding not do? Maybe with route numbers?

I find it quite hard to read the following "Quick Links" on the following:
[Image: 18015969449_a2530e1fa7.jpg]Arriva North East: 4650 / NK05 GXD by Jimmi's Bus Photos, on Flickr

It's easier to read the text on 4650 if you actually see it in person rather then viewing photos but it still doesn't stand out very much.
Jimmi
31 May 2015, 4:45 pm #446

(31 May 2015, 4:38 pm)mb134 Don't really see the point in that branding to be honest, would a simple "MAX" branding not do? Maybe with route numbers?

I find it quite hard to read the following "Quick Links" on the following:
[Image: 18015969449_a2530e1fa7.jpg]Arriva North East: 4650 / NK05 GXD by Jimmi's Bus Photos, on Flickr

It's easier to read the text on 4650 if you actually see it in person rather then viewing photos but it still doesn't stand out very much.

mb134



4,162
31 May 2015, 4:53 pm #447
(31 May 2015, 4:45 pm)Jimmi It's easier to read the text on 4650 if you actually see it in person rather then viewing photos but it still doesn't stand out very much.

I just don't think the whole idea of the "Quick links into x" is a very good branding idea, you're not telling people the service number or where else it goes to. I still think it would have a better impact with just the "MAX" logo, or "MAX" with route numbers.

I appreciate they do have a map with route numbers on the back of the Darlington Omnicities, but I'd struggle to read this after it passed me:
[Image: 16160254506_2186714b0f.jpg]Arriva North East: 4650 / NK05GXD by Daniel Graham, on Flickr


I think my opinion of the "Quick Links" branding was immediately bad, as I find the application on 7515 dull and with no real MAXimum inpact, that awful blue backing makes it look even worse:
[Image: 16955288735_77ce8606a7.jpg]Arriva North East: 7515 / NK09 FNA by Jimmi's Bus Photos, on Flickr
mb134
31 May 2015, 4:53 pm #447

(31 May 2015, 4:45 pm)Jimmi It's easier to read the text on 4650 if you actually see it in person rather then viewing photos but it still doesn't stand out very much.

I just don't think the whole idea of the "Quick links into x" is a very good branding idea, you're not telling people the service number or where else it goes to. I still think it would have a better impact with just the "MAX" logo, or "MAX" with route numbers.

I appreciate they do have a map with route numbers on the back of the Darlington Omnicities, but I'd struggle to read this after it passed me:
[Image: 16160254506_2186714b0f.jpg]Arriva North East: 4650 / NK05GXD by Daniel Graham, on Flickr


I think my opinion of the "Quick Links" branding was immediately bad, as I find the application on 7515 dull and with no real MAXimum inpact, that awful blue backing makes it look even worse:
[Image: 16955288735_77ce8606a7.jpg]Arriva North East: 7515 / NK09 FNA by Jimmi's Bus Photos, on Flickr

Kuyoyo



6,856
31 May 2015, 5:09 pm #448
(31 May 2015, 4:53 pm)mb134 I just don't think the whole idea of the "Quick links into x" is a very good branding idea, you're not telling people the service number or where else it goes to. I still think it would have a better impact with just the "MAX" logo, or "MAX" with route numbers.

I appreciate they do have a map with route numbers on the back of the Darlington Omnicities, but I'd struggle to read this after it passed me:
[Image: 16160254506_2186714b0f.jpg]Arriva North East: 4650 / NK05GXD by Daniel Graham, on Flickr


I think my opinion of the "Quick Links" branding was immediately bad, as I find the application on 7515 dull and with no real MAXimum inpact, that awful blue backing makes it look even worse:
[Image: 16955288735_77ce8606a7.jpg]Arriva North East: 7515 / NK09 FNA by Jimmi's Bus Photos, on Flickr

But surely it's better than this:
[Image: 16466856525_17d9495d1f_c.jpg]Arriva North East: 7609 / NK59DMO by Daniel Graham, on Flickr
Kuyoyo
31 May 2015, 5:09 pm #448

(31 May 2015, 4:53 pm)mb134 I just don't think the whole idea of the "Quick links into x" is a very good branding idea, you're not telling people the service number or where else it goes to. I still think it would have a better impact with just the "MAX" logo, or "MAX" with route numbers.

I appreciate they do have a map with route numbers on the back of the Darlington Omnicities, but I'd struggle to read this after it passed me:
[Image: 16160254506_2186714b0f.jpg]Arriva North East: 4650 / NK05GXD by Daniel Graham, on Flickr


I think my opinion of the "Quick Links" branding was immediately bad, as I find the application on 7515 dull and with no real MAXimum inpact, that awful blue backing makes it look even worse:
[Image: 16955288735_77ce8606a7.jpg]Arriva North East: 7515 / NK09 FNA by Jimmi's Bus Photos, on Flickr

But surely it's better than this:
[Image: 16466856525_17d9495d1f_c.jpg]Arriva North East: 7609 / NK59DMO by Daniel Graham, on Flickr

Jimmi



10,977
31 May 2015, 5:09 pm #449
(31 May 2015, 4:53 pm)mb134 I just don't think the whole idea of the "Quick links into x" is a very good branding idea, you're not telling people the service number or where else it goes to. I still think it would have a better impact with just the "MAX" logo, or "MAX" with route numbers.

I appreciate they do have a map with route numbers on the back of the Darlington Omnicities, but I'd struggle to read this after it passed me:

I think my opinion of the "Quick Links" branding was immediately bad, as I find the application on 7515 dull and with no real MAXimum inpact, that awful blue backing makes it look even worse:

Problem with having MAX with route numbers on Darlington's Omnicitys is you'd probably struggle to fit something short and sweet above the windows for the X26/X27 & X66 to grab people's attention but not confusing them at the same time as the X26/X27 & X66 both go to Darlington but that's the only place they all go to as the X26/X27 head to Richmond and beyond whilst the X66 goes to Middlesbrough. It is likely to get worse once Darlington also make the X75/X76 MAX branded with the X1 now also being MAX branded too.

Anyone know if 1416 is going to get any form of MAX branding anytime soon?

I don't like the branding as we can see in my photo of 7515, would have much preferred to have a MAX logo here instead of the quick links box.

The one I really don't like is the "branding" 7609 has which says something like: "Your usual bus is in for a service so enjoy our spare" it just looks cheap, tacky and half arsed.
Jimmi
31 May 2015, 5:09 pm #449

(31 May 2015, 4:53 pm)mb134 I just don't think the whole idea of the "Quick links into x" is a very good branding idea, you're not telling people the service number or where else it goes to. I still think it would have a better impact with just the "MAX" logo, or "MAX" with route numbers.

I appreciate they do have a map with route numbers on the back of the Darlington Omnicities, but I'd struggle to read this after it passed me:

I think my opinion of the "Quick Links" branding was immediately bad, as I find the application on 7515 dull and with no real MAXimum inpact, that awful blue backing makes it look even worse:

Problem with having MAX with route numbers on Darlington's Omnicitys is you'd probably struggle to fit something short and sweet above the windows for the X26/X27 & X66 to grab people's attention but not confusing them at the same time as the X26/X27 & X66 both go to Darlington but that's the only place they all go to as the X26/X27 head to Richmond and beyond whilst the X66 goes to Middlesbrough. It is likely to get worse once Darlington also make the X75/X76 MAX branded with the X1 now also being MAX branded too.

Anyone know if 1416 is going to get any form of MAX branding anytime soon?

I don't like the branding as we can see in my photo of 7515, would have much preferred to have a MAX logo here instead of the quick links box.

The one I really don't like is the "branding" 7609 has which says something like: "Your usual bus is in for a service so enjoy our spare" it just looks cheap, tacky and half arsed.

31 May 2015, 5:20 pm #450
(31 May 2015, 5:09 pm)Jimmi The one I really don't like is the "branding" 7609 has which says something like: "Your usual bus is in for a service so enjoy our spare" it just looks cheap, tacky and half arsed.

It's not even "MAX" branding. It would have made more sense having the blithering corporate livery on it, it'll still make its way onto the 1.
omnicity4659
31 May 2015, 5:20 pm #450

(31 May 2015, 5:09 pm)Jimmi The one I really don't like is the "branding" 7609 has which says something like: "Your usual bus is in for a service so enjoy our spare" it just looks cheap, tacky and half arsed.

It's not even "MAX" branding. It would have made more sense having the blithering corporate livery on it, it'll still make its way onto the 1.

Dan

Site Administrator

18,128
31 May 2015, 5:25 pm #451
(31 May 2015, 5:20 pm)Tommy_1581 It's not even "MAX" branding. It would have made more sense having the blithering corporate livery on it, it'll still make its way onto the 1.

As we've discussed in the past, this is why I much prefer corporate liveried spares to the same specification as the branded vehicles. Depending on how high the PVR of a service is, chances are the spare may have to be utilised on other services a fair amount. If it's in corporate livery, no biggie.

Durham have had their spare MAX Pulsar out on just about every service the depot operates. What's worse is the fact this one has specific sub-branding for service X12, opposed to any sort of generic livery. If the spare has to be in "MAX" livery, do away with all the gimmicks and just throw the logo and that's it, just like the Sapphire spares in the region. I doubt customers will care if the "usual bus" (how do you define that with Blyth?) is in for a service...
Dan
31 May 2015, 5:25 pm #451

(31 May 2015, 5:20 pm)Tommy_1581 It's not even "MAX" branding. It would have made more sense having the blithering corporate livery on it, it'll still make its way onto the 1.

As we've discussed in the past, this is why I much prefer corporate liveried spares to the same specification as the branded vehicles. Depending on how high the PVR of a service is, chances are the spare may have to be utilised on other services a fair amount. If it's in corporate livery, no biggie.

Durham have had their spare MAX Pulsar out on just about every service the depot operates. What's worse is the fact this one has specific sub-branding for service X12, opposed to any sort of generic livery. If the spare has to be in "MAX" livery, do away with all the gimmicks and just throw the logo and that's it, just like the Sapphire spares in the region. I doubt customers will care if the "usual bus" (how do you define that with Blyth?) is in for a service...

G-CPTN



961
31 May 2015, 5:26 pm #452
(31 May 2015, 5:09 pm)Jimmi to Richmond and beyond 

could become the new slogan . . . 
G-CPTN
31 May 2015, 5:26 pm #452

(31 May 2015, 5:09 pm)Jimmi to Richmond and beyond 

could become the new slogan . . . 

Jimmi



10,977
31 May 2015, 5:34 pm #453
(31 May 2015, 5:25 pm)Dan As we've discussed in the past, this is why I much prefer corporate liveried spares to the same specification as the branded vehicles. Depending on how high the PVR of a service is, chances are the spare may have to be utilised on other services a fair amount. If it's in corporate livery, no biggie.

Durham have had their spare MAX Pulsar out on just about every service the depot operates. What's worse is the fact this one has specific sub-branding for service X12, opposed to any sort of generic livery. If the spare has to be in "MAX" livery, do away with all the gimmicks and just throw the logo and that's it, just like the Sapphire spares in the region. I doubt customers will care if the "usual bus" (how do you define that with Blyth?) is in for a service...

Have to agree about spares as it is beginning to look silly now, yesterday Belmont had both Sapphire spares on non Sapphire services yesterday (43 & X12) meanwhile I dare bet that whilst 1595 was on the X12, 1415 was on the 6 again which seems to be a daily occurance at the moment.

Whilst Belmont got to chuck there Sapphires on whatever the hell they wanted Darlington ended up having to use non Sapphire spec Pulsar 1425 on the 7 yesterday.

1415 is getting on my wick now, it always seems to be on the 6 at the moment whilst the X12 has a non MAX spec bus on it, so annoying seeing it on there especially as Darlington struggle to keep MAX buses on Darlington's service whilst Belmont keep allocating 1415 on non MAX services and Stockton don't have a spare for the X12.
Jimmi
31 May 2015, 5:34 pm #453

(31 May 2015, 5:25 pm)Dan As we've discussed in the past, this is why I much prefer corporate liveried spares to the same specification as the branded vehicles. Depending on how high the PVR of a service is, chances are the spare may have to be utilised on other services a fair amount. If it's in corporate livery, no biggie.

Durham have had their spare MAX Pulsar out on just about every service the depot operates. What's worse is the fact this one has specific sub-branding for service X12, opposed to any sort of generic livery. If the spare has to be in "MAX" livery, do away with all the gimmicks and just throw the logo and that's it, just like the Sapphire spares in the region. I doubt customers will care if the "usual bus" (how do you define that with Blyth?) is in for a service...

Have to agree about spares as it is beginning to look silly now, yesterday Belmont had both Sapphire spares on non Sapphire services yesterday (43 & X12) meanwhile I dare bet that whilst 1595 was on the X12, 1415 was on the 6 again which seems to be a daily occurance at the moment.

Whilst Belmont got to chuck there Sapphires on whatever the hell they wanted Darlington ended up having to use non Sapphire spec Pulsar 1425 on the 7 yesterday.

1415 is getting on my wick now, it always seems to be on the 6 at the moment whilst the X12 has a non MAX spec bus on it, so annoying seeing it on there especially as Darlington struggle to keep MAX buses on Darlington's service whilst Belmont keep allocating 1415 on non MAX services and Stockton don't have a spare for the X12.

Kuyoyo



6,856
31 May 2015, 5:35 pm #454
(31 May 2015, 5:25 pm)Dan As we've discussed in the past, this is why I much prefer corporate liveried spares to the same specification as the branded vehicles. Depending on how high the PVR of a service is, chances are the spare may have to be utilised on other services a fair amount. If it's in corporate livery, no biggie.

Durham have had their spare MAX Pulsar out on just about every service the depot operates. What's worse is the fact this one has specific sub-branding for service X12, opposed to any sort of generic livery. If the spare has to be in "MAX" livery, do away with all the gimmicks and just throw the logo and that's it, just like the Sapphire spares in the region. I doubt customers will care if the "usual bus" (how do you define that with Blyth?) is in for a service...

There's no pleasing some people - you'd be complaining if it was in normal livery yet making daily appearances on a MAX route Wink 

As for Durham, notice that they seemingly prefer to use one of the ex-Ashington Lowlander on the X12 if a Gemini is VOR rather than 1415 - however, it's likely come the autumn they'll have no choice to use 1415 if what I've heard turns out to be true Wink 
Kuyoyo
31 May 2015, 5:35 pm #454

(31 May 2015, 5:25 pm)Dan As we've discussed in the past, this is why I much prefer corporate liveried spares to the same specification as the branded vehicles. Depending on how high the PVR of a service is, chances are the spare may have to be utilised on other services a fair amount. If it's in corporate livery, no biggie.

Durham have had their spare MAX Pulsar out on just about every service the depot operates. What's worse is the fact this one has specific sub-branding for service X12, opposed to any sort of generic livery. If the spare has to be in "MAX" livery, do away with all the gimmicks and just throw the logo and that's it, just like the Sapphire spares in the region. I doubt customers will care if the "usual bus" (how do you define that with Blyth?) is in for a service...

There's no pleasing some people - you'd be complaining if it was in normal livery yet making daily appearances on a MAX route Wink 

As for Durham, notice that they seemingly prefer to use one of the ex-Ashington Lowlander on the X12 if a Gemini is VOR rather than 1415 - however, it's likely come the autumn they'll have no choice to use 1415 if what I've heard turns out to be true Wink 

mb134



4,162
31 May 2015, 5:39 pm #455
(31 May 2015, 5:09 pm)Kuyoyo But surely it's better than this:
[Image: 16466856525_17d9495d1f_c.jpg]Arriva North East: 7609 / NK59DMO by Daniel Graham, on Flickr


Don't think much is worse than that! Wink maybe that two tone blue they used on 281 and that ex-GNE B10 a few years back? Tongue
(31 May 2015, 5:35 pm)Kuyoyo There's no pleasing some people - you'd be complaining if it was in normal livery yet making daily appearances on a MAX route Wink 

As for Durham, notice that they seemingly prefer to use one of the ex-Ashington Lowlander on the X12 if a Gemini is VOR rather than 1415 - however, it's likely come the autumn they'll have no choice to use 1415 if what I've heard turns out to be true Wink 

Something happening with the Lowlanders?
mb134
31 May 2015, 5:39 pm #455

(31 May 2015, 5:09 pm)Kuyoyo But surely it's better than this:
[Image: 16466856525_17d9495d1f_c.jpg]Arriva North East: 7609 / NK59DMO by Daniel Graham, on Flickr


Don't think much is worse than that! Wink maybe that two tone blue they used on 281 and that ex-GNE B10 a few years back? Tongue
(31 May 2015, 5:35 pm)Kuyoyo There's no pleasing some people - you'd be complaining if it was in normal livery yet making daily appearances on a MAX route Wink 

As for Durham, notice that they seemingly prefer to use one of the ex-Ashington Lowlander on the X12 if a Gemini is VOR rather than 1415 - however, it's likely come the autumn they'll have no choice to use 1415 if what I've heard turns out to be true Wink 

Something happening with the Lowlanders?

Dan

Site Administrator

18,128
31 May 2015, 5:42 pm #456
(31 May 2015, 5:35 pm)Kuyoyo There's no pleasing some people - you'd be complaining if it was in normal livery yet making daily appearances on a MAX route Wink 

As for Durham, notice that they seemingly prefer to use one of the ex-Ashington Lowlander on the X12 if a Gemini is VOR rather than 1415 - however, it's likely come the autumn they'll have no choice to use 1415 if what I've heard turns out to be true Wink 

You've seen no complaints from me about this over on the Go North East section of the forum, so there certainly wouldn't be any complaints from me on this section...

For Go North East, there's very few branded services that now have a branded spare, and even though a spare vehicle may be used frequently, there are occasions where it is not required, and is allocated to another service as a result. Arriva have "Sapphire" branded vehicles down on Teesside working normal services all day because they're often not required to deputise for the correct allocation. It's a similar situation up north with Go North East (think of the Fab56 Volvo B9TLs), but the difference is that they can be allocated to the 20/20A services on a Saturday no problem because they carry the company's corporate livery.

Although the brand identity is lost somewhat when the corporate liveried spares have to be used regularly to cover for branded vehicles (I'm thinking of the red Mercs at Stanley and the red Volvo B9TL at Riverside), I'd suggest this is still better than a 'wrong brand' working.
Dan
31 May 2015, 5:42 pm #456

(31 May 2015, 5:35 pm)Kuyoyo There's no pleasing some people - you'd be complaining if it was in normal livery yet making daily appearances on a MAX route Wink 

As for Durham, notice that they seemingly prefer to use one of the ex-Ashington Lowlander on the X12 if a Gemini is VOR rather than 1415 - however, it's likely come the autumn they'll have no choice to use 1415 if what I've heard turns out to be true Wink 

You've seen no complaints from me about this over on the Go North East section of the forum, so there certainly wouldn't be any complaints from me on this section...

For Go North East, there's very few branded services that now have a branded spare, and even though a spare vehicle may be used frequently, there are occasions where it is not required, and is allocated to another service as a result. Arriva have "Sapphire" branded vehicles down on Teesside working normal services all day because they're often not required to deputise for the correct allocation. It's a similar situation up north with Go North East (think of the Fab56 Volvo B9TLs), but the difference is that they can be allocated to the 20/20A services on a Saturday no problem because they carry the company's corporate livery.

Although the brand identity is lost somewhat when the corporate liveried spares have to be used regularly to cover for branded vehicles (I'm thinking of the red Mercs at Stanley and the red Volvo B9TL at Riverside), I'd suggest this is still better than a 'wrong brand' working.

L469 YVK



3,556
31 May 2015, 5:43 pm #457
Why don't they scrap MAX and Sapphire and launch these brands?

X21 / X22 = The Milburn Way - Fast frequent links to the heart of Ashington, Bedlington and Newcastle
X10 / X11 = Coast Express - Fast frequent connections to Blyth, Cramlington and Newcastle
X15 / X18 / X20 = Coast & Castles Connections
X14 = The Villager - Keeping Northumberland Connected
1 / 2 = Valleyway - Frequent links from the Blyth Valley to Bedlington, Ashington and Morpeth
52 / 53 / 57 / 57A = Easylink - Easy links for local people
X12 = Three Rivers Express - Fast frequent connections to and from Teesside, Durham and Newcastle
L469 YVK
31 May 2015, 5:43 pm #457

Why don't they scrap MAX and Sapphire and launch these brands?

X21 / X22 = The Milburn Way - Fast frequent links to the heart of Ashington, Bedlington and Newcastle
X10 / X11 = Coast Express - Fast frequent connections to Blyth, Cramlington and Newcastle
X15 / X18 / X20 = Coast & Castles Connections
X14 = The Villager - Keeping Northumberland Connected
1 / 2 = Valleyway - Frequent links from the Blyth Valley to Bedlington, Ashington and Morpeth
52 / 53 / 57 / 57A = Easylink - Easy links for local people
X12 = Three Rivers Express - Fast frequent connections to and from Teesside, Durham and Newcastle

Kuyoyo



6,856
31 May 2015, 5:44 pm #458
(31 May 2015, 5:39 pm)mb134 Something happening with the Lowlanders?

I can't say anything until I have it confirmed - but from what I've heard, Durham and Ashington may be having a modern standard-specification decker swap before the 6 goes Sapphire so all Sapphire deckers in the region are of the same type Wink 
Kuyoyo
31 May 2015, 5:44 pm #458

(31 May 2015, 5:39 pm)mb134 Something happening with the Lowlanders?

I can't say anything until I have it confirmed - but from what I've heard, Durham and Ashington may be having a modern standard-specification decker swap before the 6 goes Sapphire so all Sapphire deckers in the region are of the same type Wink 

Adrian



9,593
31 May 2015, 5:44 pm #459
(31 May 2015, 5:35 pm)Kuyoyo There's no pleasing some people - you'd be complaining if it was in normal livery yet making daily appearances on a MAX route Wink 

As for Durham, notice that they seemingly prefer to use one of the ex-Ashington Lowlander on the X12 if a Gemini is VOR rather than 1415 - however, it's likely come the autumn they'll have no choice to use 1415 if what I've heard turns out to be true Wink 

Why does the depot's preference come into it? If someone at Arriva has signed off painting and branding an extra vehicle for the X12, then surely that should be used in the first instance? It's a ridiculous situation having an 'X12' branded vehicle going round Durham on everything but the X12, and it confuses customers.

Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook
Adrian
31 May 2015, 5:44 pm #459

(31 May 2015, 5:35 pm)Kuyoyo There's no pleasing some people - you'd be complaining if it was in normal livery yet making daily appearances on a MAX route Wink 

As for Durham, notice that they seemingly prefer to use one of the ex-Ashington Lowlander on the X12 if a Gemini is VOR rather than 1415 - however, it's likely come the autumn they'll have no choice to use 1415 if what I've heard turns out to be true Wink 

Why does the depot's preference come into it? If someone at Arriva has signed off painting and branding an extra vehicle for the X12, then surely that should be used in the first instance? It's a ridiculous situation having an 'X12' branded vehicle going round Durham on everything but the X12, and it confuses customers.


Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook

mb134



4,162
31 May 2015, 5:45 pm #460
(31 May 2015, 5:44 pm)Kuyoyo I can't say anything until I have it confirmed - but from what I've heard, Durham and Ashington may be having a modern standard-specification decker swap before the 6 goes Sapphire so all Sapphire deckers in the region are of the same type Wink 

May have picked this up totally wrong, but do you mean Lowlanders back to Ashington *hopes* Wink 

(31 May 2015, 5:44 pm)aureolin Why does the depot's preference come into it? If someone at Arriva has signed off painting and branding an extra vehicle for the X12, then surely that should be used in the first instance? It's a ridiculous situation having an 'X12' branded vehicle going round Durham on everything but the X12, and it confuses customers.
Could it be more to do with capacity, a Lowlander will be better at peak times than a Pulsar would be?

Isn't capacity an issue with the X12?
Edited 31 May 2015, 5:46 pm by mb134.
mb134
31 May 2015, 5:45 pm #460

(31 May 2015, 5:44 pm)Kuyoyo I can't say anything until I have it confirmed - but from what I've heard, Durham and Ashington may be having a modern standard-specification decker swap before the 6 goes Sapphire so all Sapphire deckers in the region are of the same type Wink 

May have picked this up totally wrong, but do you mean Lowlanders back to Ashington *hopes* Wink 

(31 May 2015, 5:44 pm)aureolin Why does the depot's preference come into it? If someone at Arriva has signed off painting and branding an extra vehicle for the X12, then surely that should be used in the first instance? It's a ridiculous situation having an 'X12' branded vehicle going round Durham on everything but the X12, and it confuses customers.
Could it be more to do with capacity, a Lowlander will be better at peak times than a Pulsar would be?

Isn't capacity an issue with the X12?

Pages (25) Previous 122 23 24 25 Next
 
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average