(06 Jun 2022, 7:48 am)Storx wrote Don't get the obsession with trying to compete with the Metro which has no traffic issues and therefore a much more reliable service and even further is much quicker aswell.Suppose people outside of the area might. How many people know that explore tickets and ENCT passes can be used on the metro but not that many people do know that. Ideally you need what can cover Northern rail bus services and the metro at the moment nothing like that does actually exist so the buses in the summer months could actually work.
No-one bar people obsessed with buses would choose the bus.
(06 Jun 2022, 7:48 am)Storx wrote Don't get the obsession with trying to compete with the Metro which has no traffic issues and therefore a much more reliable service and even further is much quicker aswell.Is it about competing with the metro or offering some sort of alternative?
No-one bar people obsessed with buses would choose the bus.
(06 Jun 2022, 11:05 am)Andreos1 wrote Is it about competing with the metro or offering some sort of alternative?
The 27 is probably the only thing that could be classed as competing with the Metro on the southern side of the metro, but for sections of the route, doesn't. Hence it's appeal in certain areas.
But at the same time, not many will do point to point journeys and not many people are living in town centres nor want to be in them either.
A 15/20 min bus ride in to the town centre followed by another x number of mins on the metro could easily be counteracted by an alternative. Such as the X34.
(23 Jun 2023, 9:11 pm)Economic505 wrote Chester Rd and Hylton Rd are already well served, and so is Pallion. Seems a waste of resources.
(24 Jun 2023, 8:39 am)ASX_Terranova wrote You currently have the 11, 99 and 935 for Pallion. None of those go into the retail park and the 11 is being changed soon. Would I be better off serving trimdon street before pallion.
(24 Jun 2023, 10:10 am)cbma06 wrote This is what happens when bus companies are private bus companies and after dereg there can run there bus services on any route and timetables that suits them along there are registered to the traffic commissioners, it comes down to the local authorities to fund bus services which are deemed necessary, but since the budget for secured bus to the local authorities from the corrupt culprit government gets less each year and plus private bus companies are reducing there commercial services even more puts on even more strain for the local authorities to step in.
Service 11 used to go in Pallion retail park but the demand is not there no more and not viable to make profit for the big cats.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(24 Jun 2023, 10:23 am)Michael wrote I'm sure the 594 still goes down to the retail park?, I'm 50% sure the 18/19 went down at once point too.
(06 Aug 2023, 10:51 pm)ASX_Terranova wrote Following on from my GNE express suggestions are there any routes where an express version might work where one doesn't already exist e.g. an 36X in Middlesbrough or a 40X in NewcastleProbably the 36 in Middlesbrough is the only Stagecoach service that would work with an express. Possibly since the 13 has been extended that could probably just about work as well but I don’t think any other Hartlepool or Teesside services would need an express.
(08 Aug 2023, 4:52 pm)col87 wrote Probably the 36 in Middlesbrough is the only Stagecoach service that would work with an express. Possibly since the 13 has been extended that could probably just about work as well but I don’t think any other Hartlepool or Teesside services would need an express.
(08 Aug 2023, 6:30 pm)deanmachine wrote Would it though? I think if I wanted to get to Stockton or 'Boro from Hartlepool I'd just jump on the train. It's probably why there isn't one in the first place.
Forum Moderator | Let us know if you have any issues
Service Manager, Coatham Connect
(08 Aug 2023, 6:30 pm)deanmachine wrote Would it though? I think if I wanted to get to Stockton or 'Boro from Hartlepool I'd just jump on the train. It's probably why there isn't one in the first place.
(08 Aug 2023, 9:04 pm)col87 wrote Yes if you wanted to pay more and it been overcrowded with the chance of cancellations and in the case of Stockton been a good walk away from the Town Centre then it roughly makes sense.
(09 Aug 2023, 8:16 pm)Storx wrote In fairness there's probably few people from Hartlepool who want to go to Stockton and few people from Stockton who want to go to Hartlepool.
An X36, would just kill the 36 imo, it's pretty express anyway really.
(10 Aug 2023, 5:55 pm)Lollist wrote It takes like an hour from boro - pools but doubt an x36 would be much quicker didnt it used to exist years ago i remember stumbling across an old timetable online last year
(10 Aug 2023, 6:25 pm)Storx wrote Not too sure on the X36 tbf.
The 1 is only like 45 minutes though isn't it? Not too bad either really, it takes like 25 minutes to drive it and with parking etc won't be much in it.
The only area I could really think of is an express down to Coulby Newham, maybe something like running limited stop from Middlesbrough to Bluebell Corner:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Ash+Gr...?entry=ttu
With the 10 terminating at The Derby (or withdrawn it's covered by Arriva anyway), 12 dropped to 3 BPH and extended to Lingfield Drive and 13 terminating at Stainton.
They probably deserve something a bit quicker.
(10 Aug 2023, 6:37 pm)RobinHood wrote I think a smaller operator did try a fast Coulby Newham to Mbro service in the not so dim and distant past, but unfortunately it simply didn't work.
The end to end demand probably doesn't justify the resources needed to cater for it (at a reasonable frequency).
(09 Aug 2023, 8:16 pm)Storx wrote In fairness there's probably few people from Hartlepool who want to go to Stockton and few people from Stockton who want to go to Hartlepool.
An X36, would just kill the 36 imo, it's pretty express anyway really.
(11 Aug 2023, 5:00 pm)col87 wrote I disagree I don’t think it would and would hardly call it an express when it goes the long way out of Billingham and pretty much stops at every bus stop Billingham Town centre and Middlesbrough Bus station. An X36 could probably run the same route from Hartlepool to Billingham Town Centre then go non stop to North Tees Hospital - Then Roseworth then on to Teesside Park and Middlesbrough it would probably still be quicker than the 36 as well plus open up new links.
(11 Aug 2023, 8:36 pm)Storx wrote Not sure that would be any quicker than the 1 would it for Middlesbrough at least anyway. Just not sure you could realistically make it much quicker without killing other services for the sake of 5 minutes or so, even known the hospital link would useful.
.
If you wanted a hospital link imo it would be better to extend the 59 through to Billingham every 30 minutes like so
Like so: https://www.google.com/maps/dir/54.60784...?entry=ttu
(13 Aug 2023, 1:31 pm)col87 wrote It would give a proper service from Hartlepool to North Tees Hospital which really is needed.
(14 Aug 2023, 2:22 pm)Kuyoyo wrote Where the bingo card when you need it......
How many times has this 'suggestion' been brought up? If that link was really needed, don't you think the CA would be currently tendering such a service?
In any case, your suggestion for an X36 is miles away from the old X36 - which was:
Before 20th September 2004: Hart Village and Clavering to Middlesbrough via Hart Station, Brus Arms, Hartlepool Centre, Oxford Road, Catcote Road, Rossmere Road, Greatham Sapps Corner, Billingham The Swan Hotel, A19 and X66
20th September 2004 until withdrawl: Hart Village and Clavering to Middlesbrough via Hart Station, Brus Arms, Hartlepool Centre, Oxford Road, Catcote Road, Rossmere Road, Greatham Sapps Corner, Wolviston Village, Wolviston Court, Billingham Catholic Club A19 and X66
And even then, it was one journey a day in each direction - the morning journey left Hart Village at 0742 and arrived into Middlesbrough at 0845 (0849 from 20th September 2004) while the return journey left Middlesbrough at 1710 and reached Clavering at 1807 (no Hart Village returns on an afternoon).
Really, there's no need for any express versions of current services on Teesside - any direct Middlesbrough to Hartlepool journeys are provided by the 1.
(15 Aug 2023, 12:01 am)col87 wrote You’re wrong they has been a need for a service between Hartlepool and North Tees Hospital for the last 12 years since the Council axed the H1. Obviously you don’t live in Hartlepool so won’t know how difficult it is to get to North Tees by bus from the town. The problem is none of the bus companies or the combined authority seem interested in doing anything it also costs quite a bit in a taxi as well.I had to go to North Tees from Hartlepool last week and hadn’t realised the 36 wasn’t direct. Also, the journey time was horrendous when compared to a car (which I used in the end). Defo a need for a faster and direct link .
As for the X36 I never said the route was how it was originally I was suggesting a new express route with same number.
Yes the 1 is the quickest but even then it can take around 45minutes to get from Middlesbrough to Hartlepool Town Centre and it’s not exactly direct either considering it does all of Seaton Carew then the clearances.
As for the combined authority they only seem to be doing what suits them and not services that are actually needed otherwise they would be some sort of service in every area.
(15 Aug 2023, 8:34 am)Storx wrote imo the only potential way you might get a North Tees link to work would be to link existing services so maybe something like:
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/54.58445...?entry=ttu
With the short 1's being part of it, the 35 withdrawn (it's clearly struggling anyway) and then it being bolted onto the 57, 58 or 59 at the hospital end (take your pick which). 59 is the easiest but longest.
If I'm right the PVR should be only be 1 extra bus, could make it serve Greatham aswell and pull the 36 out of there to slightly speed that up. It's absolutely ridiculous that Wynyard Business Park is unserved and would be quite popular imo, you just have to look at the 4 and extra 58's at Follingsby and there's no public transport at all to there.
(15 Aug 2023, 8:34 am)Storx wrote imo the only potential way you might get a North Tees link to work would be to link existing services so maybe something like:
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/54.58445...?entry=ttu
With the short 1's being part of it, the 35 withdrawn (it's clearly struggling anyway) and then it being bolted onto the 57, 58 or 59 at the hospital end (take your pick which). 59 is the easiest but longest.
If I'm right the PVR should be only be 1 extra bus, could make it serve Greatham aswell and pull the 36 out of there to slightly speed that up. It's absolutely ridiculous that Wynyard Business Park is unserved and would be quite popular imo, you just have to look at the 4 and extra 58's at Follingsby and there's no public transport at all to there.