(08 Feb 2016, 11:09 am)Diamond One wrote [ -> ]I know most people on simply go north east group have a NEB account anyways on here so this will shouldn't really tell you me lee Dan.P Davie myself he should only tell the people via inbox the ones who are not a member then again Lee gave me out some advice weeks ago about him I simply ignore him
As I said in the past, ignore him.
I shadow what Gary is saying...
(08 Feb 2016, 11:09 am)Diamond One wrote [ -> ]I know most people on simply go north east group have a NEB account anyways on here so this will shouldn't really tell you me lee Dan.P Davie myself he should only tell the people via inbox the ones who are not a member then again Lee gave me out some advice weeks ago about him I simply ignore him
Forgive me if I am wrong. But is this site not a public site. It does not give members the right to exclusive information just because that member is also on another site.
I have said in the past if you are made aware of something possibly happening either shate it to all members or keep quiet altogether and stop trying to wind up the other members with your ' I know something you don't know'. Thus goes to all members not just the member who's post this replies to
(08 Feb 2016, 11:55 am)ifm001 wrote [ -> ]Forgive me if I am wrong. But is this site not a public site. It does not give members the right to exclusive information just because that member is also on another site.
I have said in the past if you are made aware of something possibly happening either shate it to all members or keep quiet altogether and stop trying to wind up the other members with your ' I know something you don't know'. Thus goes to all members not just the member who's post this replies to
Couldn't of said it any better.
(08 Feb 2016, 11:58 am)Davie wrote [ -> ]Just a suggestion Baz, I'm not having a go. Why don't you block him?
One step ahead of ya I already did the day Lee gave me the advice via inbox on here
I'm not on the Simply GNE group, I left last week because I sick of it filling my facebook newsfeed with either crappy blurred photos of a third of a bus or several hundred photos of buses taken within 50 metres of cling on corner.
(08 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm)GMitchelhill wrote [ -> ]I'm not on the Simply GNE group, I left last week because I sick of it filling my facebook newsfeed with either crappy blurred photos of a third of a bus or several hundred photos of buses taken within 50 metres of cling on corner.
If only the like button was still here......that deserves a LIKE from me!
(08 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm)GMitchelhill wrote [ -> ]I'm not on the Simply GNE group, I left last week because I sick of it filling my facebook newsfeed with either crappy blurred photos of a third of a bus or several hundred photos of buses taken within 50 metres of cling on corner.
Apparently the number of people on that group are tumbling as some have left for the sheer garbage that gets posted and others were banned for being 'childish' I was never on it and probably never will be now.
(08 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm)GMitchelhill wrote [ -> ]I'm not on the Simply GNE group, I left last week because I sick of it filling my facebook newsfeed with either crappy blurred photos of a third of a bus or several hundred photos of buses taken within 50 metres of cling on corner.
Only took about 3 photos there today while waiting for my bus for my Arriva adventure it's rare I take photos at Haymarket now or Cling on corner as it is known as the old saying goes plenty of places to visit this arriva bus am on is like a Sunday drive smooth as a pound
(08 Feb 2016, 12:54 pm)Jimmi wrote [ -> ]Apparently the number of people on that group are tumbling as some have left for the sheer garbage that gets posted and others were banned for being 'childish' I was never on it and probably never will be now.
Exactly why i'm not part of any Facebook groups.
Those were banned were because the group owner lacked a sense of humour and / or disagreed with him.
(09 Feb 2016, 11:45 am)Michael wrote [ -> ]Got over 11000 posts now 
You used to be behind me!
To be fair, the majority of your posts are questions or stating you arent from a specific area :p
Well done on getting beyond the 11k post mark!
(09 Feb 2016, 12:56 pm)Andreos1 wrote [ -> ]You used to be behind me!
To be fair, the majority of your posts are questions or stating you arent from a specific area :p
Well done on getting beyond the 11k post mark!
I have to agree 100% on that!
The other majority is asking questions!
Thanks
(09 Feb 2016, 1:03 pm)Michael wrote [ -> ]I have to agree 100% on that!
The other majority is asking questions!
Thanks
No bother Michael!
In other news, I have been dragged in to a little issue at work.
An organisation I have dealings with are in a little bit bother because they haven't been following the rules for under 18's and nightshifts.
Obviously I can't go in to details and won't - but it is a right mess.
Risk assessments weren't carried out, rules weren't followed, breaks weren't given and there was an accident.
(Adrian will love this next bit)
There was no union representation either.
Despite all of the paperwork I need to read through and check, I am glad I am not in the shoes of the supervisor nor the organisation.
What a farce.
(09 Feb 2016, 1:13 pm)Andreos1 wrote [ -> ]No bother Michael!
In other news, I have been dragged in to a little issue at work.
An organisation I have dealings with are in a little bit bother because they haven't been following the rules for under 18's and nightshifts.
Obviously I can't go in to details and won't - but it is a right mess.
Risk assessments weren't carried out, rules weren't followed, breaks weren't given and there was an accident.
(Adrian will love this next bit)
There was no union representation either.
Despite all of the paperwork I need to read through and check, I am glad I am not in the shoes of the supervisor nor the organisation.
What a farce.
Someone's going to be in some deep do do for that. And probably not the person who should have ultimate responsibility for it.
(09 Feb 2016, 7:47 pm)BusLoverMum wrote [ -> ]Someone's going to be in some deep do do for that. And probably not the person who should have ultimate responsibility for it.
Tell me about it!
All I can do is make recommendations and suggestions. Up to others to decide ultimately.
Fortunately the injury wasn't serious.
From the outside looking in, the organisation were totally oblivious to these goings on.
The department involved had been given a lot of autonomy.
However, it goes back to that old chestnut about communication.
There seems to have been none from the organisation downwards during induction and certainly none from the department concerned, such as checking with HR on rules/legislation on under 18 night-working.
Ignorance isn't an excuse.
(09 Feb 2016, 1:13 pm)Andreos1 wrote [ -> ]No bother Michael!
In other news, I have been dragged in to a little issue at work.
An organisation I have dealings with are in a little bit bother because they haven't been following the rules for under 18's and nightshifts.
Obviously I can't go in to details and won't - but it is a right mess.
Risk assessments weren't carried out, rules weren't followed, breaks weren't given and there was an accident.
(Adrian will love this next bit)
There was no union representation either.
Despite all of the paperwork I need to read through and check, I am glad I am not in the shoes of the supervisor nor the organisation.
What a farce.
Uh-oh... RIDDOR reportable?
It continues to be a shocking statistic and how much safer unionised workplaces are, compared to those that aren't. I recall the TUC posting something at length about this a couple years ago.
(10 Feb 2016, 9:53 pm)Adrian wrote [ -> ]Uh-oh... RIDDOR reportable?
It continues to be a shocking statistic and how much safer unionised workplaces are, compared to those that aren't. I recall the TUC posting something at length about this a couple years ago.
Fortunately for the person who was injured, it wasn't serious enough to fall into RIDDOR categorisation.
The supervisor certainly falls into the ignorant pain in the ar$e categorisation.
Why they thought giving an under 18 year old, the tasks they did, on a nightshift waa acceptable- is totally baffling.
Hearing that it's snowing in Stanley/Durham, anyone confirm?
(13 Feb 2016, 11:02 am)Michael wrote [ -> ]Hearing that it's snowing in Stanley/Durham, anyone confirm?
It certainly was. Didn't lie where i am with it raining not long before.
(13 Feb 2016, 11:02 am)Michael wrote [ -> ]Hearing that it's snowing in Stanley/Durham, anyone confirm?
Possibly Stanley way, but was just pissing down east of durham about an hour ago (and is in Stockton, now)
(13 Feb 2016, 11:17 am)BusLoverMum wrote [ -> ]Possibly Stanley way, but was just pissing down east of durham about an hour ago (and is in Stockton, now)
It snowed in Murton twice for about 5 minutes earlier [GRINNING FACE WITH SMILING EYES]
(13 Feb 2016, 11:02 am)Michael wrote [ -> ]Hearing that it's snowing in Stanley/Durham, anyone confirm?
Just checked fb and there are photos showing snow laying in Consett and it falling in Sunderland and Houghton.
(13 Feb 2016, 12:12 pm)Andreos1 wrote [ -> ]Just checked fb and there are photos showing snow laying in Consett and it falling in Sunderland and Houghton.
Yeah - heard it was laying in Consett. Just not here in Stanley.
Snowing in Whitley Bay right now.
(13 Feb 2016, 12:13 pm)S813 FVK wrote [ -> ]Yeah - heard it was laying in Consett. Just not here in Stanley.
Who needs accuweather or windows in a house when fb tells you what the weather is like...
(13 Feb 2016, 12:28 pm)Andreos1 wrote [ -> ]Who needs accuweather or windows in a house when fb tells you what the weather is like...
Got no warning about this today, stupid accuweather!
Agree, the weather is nothing like yesterday's forecast, or else we'd have given teesside park a miss.
Turned out sunny but cold in darlo, this afty, though.
Remember this technology?
Unfortunately, this particular tape turned out not to be worth saving
