19 May 2021, 9:30 am
(18 May 2021, 11:47 pm)6049 wrote [ -> ]Have you got a link to that?
Sent from my SM-G981B using Tapatalk
I’m at work so can’t access Facebook but the group is called Birtley now and then.
if you search 23 it comes up
(18 May 2021, 11:47 pm)6049 wrote [ -> ]Have you got a link to that?
Sent from my SM-G981B using Tapatalk
(19 May 2021, 12:26 pm)Micheal Aaron wrote [ -> ]Gct will take over the Little Coasters network. Do I want that. No as tons of people rely on these routes.
(19 May 2021, 12:29 pm)Rob44 wrote [ -> ]are all " little coaster" routes secured by nexus?Yea. 41/42/42A/19/11
(19 May 2021, 12:29 pm)Rob44 wrote [ -> ]are all " little coaster" routes secured by nexus?
(19 May 2021, 1:33 pm)Rob44 wrote [ -> ]So in reality GCT could only really attempt to win the evening and Sunday contacts from GNE... they could take over the full running of GNE commercial parts of the route?More than likely if that did happen. Gct taking over them routes fully. I could see GNE taking and trying new routes to see if they would profit
(20 May 2021, 11:23 am)Chris 1 wrote [ -> ]Do Gateshead Central operate anything commercially? I'm not sure they've ever taken a stab at operating anything commercially. Their whole MO seems to me to be contracted services with the guaranteed income. Presumably with costs nailed firmly down judging by comments elsewhere about vehicle/driver/ticket machine shortages. Attempting to muscle in commercially certainly wouldn't be cheap. Unlikely to happen imo.
(23 May 2021, 10:31 am)Dan wrote [ -> ]They do, albeit just a few journeys which are effectively light runs. The 939A and 99A, for example, are not secured by Nexus. Gateshead Central Taxis run these (empty) commercially, on the basis they'd run that way anyway.
In other news, Nexus put out a tender to provide extra journeys on service 333 this summer. The contract sees journeys provided on Sundays and Bank Holidays from 30 May to 30 August, with a minimum requirement for a capacity of 60 (including standees) and emissions no lower than Euro 5. Despite not having any vehicles in their fleet of this specification, Gateshead Central Taxis won this contract. I would imagine it'll likely be sub-contracted to L&B Travel, using Rural Link's ex-GNE Scania L94.
Revised timetable here: https://www.nexus.org.uk/sites/default/f...300521.pdf
(23 May 2021, 10:42 am)Michael wrote [ -> ]Makes you wonder if the owner of Gateshead Central Taxi's has something over NEXUS, as they seem to be winning everything... even if they don't have the buses for the contracts....
(23 May 2021, 10:42 am)Michael wrote [ -> ]Makes you wonder if the owner of Gateshead Central Taxi's has something over NEXUS, as they seem to be winning everything... even if they don't have the buses for the contracts....Im starting to think that too Michael
(23 May 2021, 10:58 am)Andreos1 wrote [ -> ]Not defending GCT at all, but there's many a contract been won without the actual vehicles being in situ. Not just in the NE, but across the UK.
Smaller contracts or even those which are larger.
(23 May 2021, 10:31 am)Dan wrote [ -> ]They do, albeit just a few journeys which are effectively light runs. The 939A and 99A, for example, are not secured by Nexus. Gateshead Central Taxis run these (empty) commercially, on the basis they'd run that way anyway.Does SK67FMY not meet the contractual requirements with 37 seated and 23 standing.
In other news, Nexus put out a tender to provide extra journeys on service 333 this summer. The contract sees journeys provided on Sundays and Bank Holidays from 30 May to 30 August, with a minimum requirement for a capacity of 60 (including standees) and emissions no lower than Euro 5. Despite not having any vehicles in their fleet of this specification, Gateshead Central Taxis won this contract. I would imagine it'll likely be sub-contracted to L&B Travel, using Rural Link's ex-GNE Scania L94.
Revised timetable here: https://www.nexus.org.uk/sites/default/f...300521.pdf
(23 May 2021, 3:59 pm)GuyParkRoyal wrote [ -> ]Does SK67FMY not meet the contractual requirements with 37 seated and 23 standing.
(23 May 2021, 12:55 pm)Micheal Aaron wrote [ -> ]The fact is GCT will win contracts from nexus. They won't provide buses. They will get sent to L&B. Give it time probably in a year. GCT will win nearly every public contracts ran by other companies. 392 by Henry Coppers 92 by A Line probably more but I can't think of any oh yea the 33 by GNE. The 46 by Arriva. It goes to show nexus will hand GCT the contracts and there is nothing we can do about it. The thing it if people want to stop these contracts took over. Make the services have more passengers. You know Nexus will do something when they find out if the 333 didn't run. Oh I could see GCT hit with a big No No by Vosa and Nexus. That service is vital to the Ferry. If that doesn't run. We'll yea. Wonder how that would appear to GCT
(24 May 2021, 3:14 pm)Rob44 wrote [ -> ]I would think arriva would do a GNE and take the 46 commercially rather that let any ( are there any??) nexus secured running of the 46 off them.The fact any service that barely has passengers will or are owned by nexus will go to GCT. Give it in a year. Companies like A Line and Henry Coppers amongst others. Lose work due to gct. Bloody hell I wouldn't be surprised GCT will win a metro replacement contract. We all know how fun that will be
(24 May 2021, 3:54 pm)Micheal Aaron wrote [ -> ]The fact any service that barely has passengers will or are owned by nexus will go to GCT. Give it in a year. Companies like A Line and Henry Coppers amongst others. Lose work due to gct. Bloody hell I wouldn't be surprised GCT will win a metro replacement contract. We all know how fun that will be
(23 May 2021, 4:24 pm)Dan wrote [ -> ]If it’s 37 seats and 23 standing, then that would add up to 60 so yes it does. Unusual for a vehicle of such small length to have so many standees but that seemed like a confident rhetorical question to make a point, so I will assume you’re correct.SK19EYH also meets (and exceeds) the contractual requirements for the summer Sunday 333 Ferry Bus. The capacity information as provided by the manufacturer at the front of the vehicle is 33 seated and 34 standing or 27 seated and 49 standing.
I understand similar vehicle SL16YPE has now been withdrawn from service and is being stripped for spare parts. Does SK19EYH also meet contract specification (I note it has four fewer seats), or will Gateshead Central Taxis run the contract without a spare vehicle which complies with the contractual requirements?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(24 May 2021, 3:59 pm)Rob44 wrote [ -> ]That is a bit of a sweeping statement! There are plenty of commercial services that don't carry full loads which have nothing to do with nexus! Take the GNE 29 service... Dan has mentioned it on here and it was common knowledge that GCT tried to win the secured contract to run it all day but when GNE realised they decided to run the entire service commercially ( except first run of the day) and before the Covid it seemed to be success full!!I guarantee GCT win the 33 contract in Newcastle next year. They seem to be winning contracts left right and centre. GCT this year have already won the SNS (for some reason) the 79/79A the 6 552 and 553. And were only at the end of May
(27 May 2021, 2:29 pm)Rapidsnap wrote [ -> ]GCT have a white 21 plate Fiat Ducato / Mellor on loan. Saw it on R1 earlier, hoping to get reg details if the driver continues to terminus. (Unlikely)