North East Buses

Full Version: Stagecoach North East: Upcoming Service Changes
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Looks to be that there is some form of TTRO on barrack road on the 12.I’m assuming that it affects the rest of the buses that go via barrack road including the 39/40.Is there some sort of road works coming up or something like that?
Stagecoach are to introduce a new service in South Shields to compliment the existing service 12 that was cut from every 30 minutes to hourly in May.
The new service will be numbered 13 and will run from the Town Centre to Cleadon Park(The Lonnen) via the coast, possibly similar to the 516 if not instead of.
Watch this space....
(Yesterday, 4:07 pm)Retro Nero wrote [ -> ]Stagecoach are to introduce a new service in South Shields to compliment the existing service 12 that was cut from every 30 minutes to hourly in May.
The new service will be numbered 13 and will run from the Town Centre to Cleadon Park(The Lonnen) via the coast, possibly similar to the 516 if not instead of.
Watch this space....

Used to be both the 512 and 513 to The Lonnen, back in the day..   God, arent I old?
(Yesterday, 6:56 pm)LVK 404L wrote [ -> ]Used to be both the 512 and 513 to The Lonnen, back in the day..   God, arent I old?

No not really, I remember the 43,& 44, 
I think the 43 was Pier Head to Watson Avenue and the 44 was The Lonnen,... Yes two separate services up Quarry Lane, and I think one went up Larch Avenue from Prince Edward Rd, ( you will have to Google Maps)..,so I think I'm bloody old
(Yesterday, 4:07 pm)Retro Nero wrote [ -> ]Stagecoach are to introduce a new service in South Shields to compliment the existing service 12 that was cut from every 30 minutes to hourly in May.
The new service will be numbered 13 and will run from the Town Centre to Cleadon Park(The Lonnen) via the coast, possibly similar to the 516 if not instead of.
Watch this space....

Chronicle article has a quote from Stagecoach: "A Stagecoach spokesperson said: 'We have developed a proposal in collaboration with Nexus which could provide a half-hourly bus link to Cleadon Park. This would be delivered through a combination of two bus routes, services 12 and 13 (each running hourly).'"

So they've cut the service, resisted the uproar it's created locally, and then just been handed public money to provide an additional service to make up the half hour frequency? Has this even gone through a competitive tender exercise?
(8 hours ago)Adrian wrote [ -> ]Chronicle article has a quote from Stagecoach: "A Stagecoach spokesperson said: 'We have developed a proposal in collaboration with Nexus which could provide a half-hourly bus link to Cleadon Park. This would be delivered through a combination of two bus routes, services 12 and 13 (each running hourly).'"

So they've cut the service, resisted the uproar it's created locally, and then just been handed public money to provide an additional service to make up the half hour frequency? Has this even gone through a competitive tender exercise? 

Nothing ever changes does it?
(4 hours ago)Andreos1 wrote [ -> ]Nothing ever changes does it?

Well the 13 route does seem similar to the 516, a service drawn from the subsidised one?
(8 hours ago)Adrian wrote [ -> ]Chronicle article has a quote from Stagecoach: "A Stagecoach spokesperson said: 'We have developed a proposal in collaboration with Nexus which could provide a half-hourly bus link to Cleadon Park. This would be delivered through a combination of two bus routes, services 12 and 13 (each running hourly).'"

So they've cut the service, resisted the uproar it's created locally, and then just been handed public money to provide an additional service to make up the half hour frequency? Has this even gone through a competitive tender exercise?

To be fair isn't this the point of the partnership though? If it does involve the 516, then it's a good move imo. There's plenty other contracts around which don't go up for tender, especially evening and Sunday services.

It's certainly better than the other operator who just drops everything and then wins the contracts back on routes they ditched. To make it even worse, then when they lose the same contract, miraculously the bus is commercially viable again like the 67 and 69. 

Personally I wish we seen more stuff like this, a partnership has to work both ways imo. 

Mind that said, if it does go in that direction, I don't really understand why it's not being ran as a loop rather than two buses terminating in the middle of nowhere. The links to the seafront, could be popular from areas it serves.